Re: Master-agent vs. Sub-agent vs. pluggable object

2006-07-24 Thread Alon Marx
On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 12:46 +0100, Dave Shield wrote: > On 24/07/06, Alon Marx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have written some of the functionality, compiled as part of the master > > agent, and tried to access the new parameters. Well, it doesn't work.. > > > > I am aware that the code is inclu

Re: Master-agent vs. Sub-agent vs. pluggable object

2006-07-24 Thread Dave Shield
On 24/07/06, Alon Marx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have written some of the functionality, compiled as part of the master > agent, and tried to access the new parameters. Well, it doesn't work.. > > I am aware that the code is included in the agent library (checked with > nm that libnetsnmpmibs

Re: Master-agent vs. Sub-agent vs. pluggable object

2006-07-24 Thread Alon Marx
I have written some of the functionality, compiled as part of the master agent, and tried to access the new parameters. Well, it doesn't work.. I am aware that the code is included in the agent library (checked with nm that libnetsnmpmibs has the relevant functions). However, when I run snmpd, I

Re: Master-agent vs. Sub-agent vs. pluggable object

2006-07-17 Thread Alon Marx
Thanks for the advice. I'll start with the master agent approach. Lots of work ahead :) On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 16:10 +0100, Dave Shield wrote: > On 17/07/06, Alon Marx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have a MIB file with the relevant parameters and I more or less > > figured out how to use mib2c

Re: Master-agent vs. Sub-agent vs. pluggable object

2006-07-17 Thread Dave Shield
On 17/07/06, Alon Marx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a MIB file with the relevant parameters and I more or less > figured out how to use mib2c and complete the relevant code. Now I'm > trying to figure out what's the best way to use these files: > 1. compile as part of the master agent > 2. c