RE: possible bug in getnext implementation

2007-12-12 Thread Rotem Tzuk
Thanks a lot This was very helpful Rotem -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Shield Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 7:03 PM To: Rotem Tzuk Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: possible bug in getnext implementation On

Re: possible bug in getnext implementation

2007-12-11 Thread Dave Shield
On 11/12/2007, Rotem Tzuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying to use snmpset to set values in table. > I use snmpset ... MyMIB::MyVal.1 = newVal > For now this does not work. > Is this the correct way to do it? If you are using string-valued indexes, then no - this won't work. You must use the

Re: possible bug in getnext implementation

2007-12-11 Thread Dave Shield
On 11/12/2007, Rotem Tzuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I expected the index to refer to the number of rows in my table. That sounds more like an integer-based index. With an integer index, the rows will typically be myObject.1 myObject.2 : myObject.N With a string index, the r

RE: possible bug in getnext implementation

2007-12-11 Thread Rotem Tzuk
ember 11, 2007 5:47 PM To: Rotem Tzuk Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: possible bug in getnext implementation On 11/12/2007, Rotem Tzuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > it's indexed by string value. > I use a name as index In which case, if the row index string i

RE: possible bug in getnext implementation

2007-12-11 Thread Rotem Tzuk
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 5:47 PM To: Rotem Tzuk Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: possible bug in getnext implementation On 11/12/2007, Rotem Tzuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > it's indexed by string value. > I use a name as index In which case, if the

Re: possible bug in getnext implementation

2007-12-11 Thread Dave Shield
On 11/12/2007, Rotem Tzuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > it's indexed by string value. > I use a name as index In which case, if the row index string is "Station1" (length 8), then a GETNEXT request for someColumn.9 would indeed move on to the next column. The OID of this instance would be s

RE: possible bug in getnext implementation

2007-12-11 Thread Rotem Tzuk
it's indexed by string value. I use a name as index Rotem -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Shield Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 5:15 PM To: Rotem Tzuk Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: possible bug in ge

Re: possible bug in getnext implementation

2007-12-11 Thread Dave Shield
On 11/12/2007, Rotem Tzuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Calling snmpgetnext -v2c - c public localhost MyMIB::MyOID.1 to get index > no. 1 works fine. > It works fine for indexes up to 8. > Trying snmpgetnext -v2c - c public localhost MyMIB::MyOID.9 resulted in > skipping to the next column. How is