Re: Re :Re: Re :Re: {SPAM?} Re :Re: Doubt

2006-11-02 Thread Dave Shield
On 2 Nov 2006 05:49:50 -, joseph antony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What ever SIGNAL it may be say SIGKILL or SIGTERM or HUP the > behaviour is same. I'm surprised. The expected behaviour of KILL, TERM and HUP is very different. HUP ought to signal the agent to re-read the config file, whi

Re :Re: Re :Re: {SPAM?} Re :Re: Doubt

2006-11-01 Thread joseph antony
Thomas,  What ever SIGNAL it may be say SIGKILL or SIGTERM or HUP thebehaviour is same.net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net wrotejoseph antony wrote:> 4. Now stop the agent by giving a kill -9 agent_pid.Argh. You've been saying "SIGTERM" initially, but you're sending SIGKILLhere. Don't do.+