RE: SNMP-PROXY-MIB

2008-04-24 Thread Wang, John
Hi Dave, Thanks for clarification. John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Shield Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 1:39 AM To: Wang, John Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: SNMP-PROXY-MIB 2008/4/23 Wang, John <[EM

Re: SNMP-PROXY-MIB

2008-04-24 Thread Dave Shield
2008/4/23 Wang, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 1. Can the Net-SNMP's proxy forward the traps and informs as > SNMP-PROXY-MIB implementation does? The NET-SNMP agent doesn't handle receiving (or forwarding) notifications.You need to look at the "snmptrapd" recei

RE: SNMP-PROXY-MIB

2008-04-23 Thread Wang, John
Thanks a lot for your info. 1. Can the Net-SNMP's proxy forward the traps and informs as SNMP-PROXY-MIB implementation does? 2. You mentioned in your previous email that the SNMP-PROXY-MIB couldn't support dynamic configuration of our current "proxy" directive. Does it imp

Re: SNMP-PROXY-MIB

2008-04-23 Thread Dave Shield
2008/4/23 Wang, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 1. What's the IMO? In My Opinion > 2. What's the model of proxy forwarding assumed in SNMP-PROXY-MIB The Proxy MIB model will look at the contex of an incoming request, (or the community string), and use that administrative

RE: SNMP-PROXY-MIB

2008-04-23 Thread Wang, John
Thanks for the info. I'll appreciate if you could explain: 1. What's the IMO? 2. What's the model of proxy forwarding assumed in SNMP-PROXY-MIB and used in Net-SNMP? Thanks. John Wang -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of D

Re: SNMP-PROXY-MIB

2008-04-23 Thread Dave Shield
2008/4/22 Wang, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I just wondered if the SNMP-PROXY-MIB has been implemented in Net-SNMP. No. > If not, is there any plan to implement it in the future releases? I'm not aware of any such plans. This MIB would be of limited use (i.e. none IMO!), s

SNMP-PROXY-MIB

2008-04-22 Thread Wang, John
Hi, I just wondered if the SNMP-PROXY-MIB has been implemented in Net-SNMP. If not, is there any plan to implement it in the future releases? Thanks, John - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference