Re: Slow Access to IP Interfaces Table

2004-10-29 Thread Joe Clark
> On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 15:37:10 -0500 (CDT) Joe wrote: > JC> > time snmpwalk -c public -v 2c localhost ifIndex > JC> > time snmpgetnext -c public -v 2c localhost ifTable.2 > JC> > JC> Nope...both of those commands took about the same length of time (0.22s & > JC> 0.29s). > > Inter

Re: Slow Access to IP Interfaces Table

2004-10-29 Thread Users
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 15:37:10 -0500 (CDT) Joe wrote: JC> > time snmpwalk -c public -v 2c localhost ifIndex JC> > time snmpgetnext -c public -v 2c localhost ifTable.2 JC> JC> Nope...both of those commands took about the same length of time (0.22s & JC> 0.29s). Interesting.. so which column is t

Re: Slow Access to IP Interfaces Table

2004-10-29 Thread Users
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:52:50 -0600 Carlos wrote: CC> Is there a way to use this 'time' command such that it gives the CC> run time of each OID? No, that would have to be done inside of snmpwalk.. CC> But without turning on debugging which may slow the CC> system down a bit. Any ideas? Look at h

Re: Slow Access to IP Interfaces Table

2004-10-29 Thread Carlos Cantu
>$ time snmpwalk -Cp -Ct localhost ifTable >Variables found: 110 >Total traversal time = 0.159480 seconds >real0m0.322s Neat command! My time for 'time snmpwalk -Cp $AGENT ifTable' was: real0m0.215s user0m0.050s sys

Re: Slow Access to IP Interfaces Table

2004-10-29 Thread Joe Clark
> Please don't repost questions daily. It's annoying and will tend to get your > questions ignored by the people most likely to be able to help. Yeah, sorry about that. I didn't have my subscription set up (I signed up a while ago but didn't return the confirmation I guess), so it went to a moder

Re: Slow Access to IP Interfaces Table

2004-10-29 Thread Users
Please don't repost questions daily. It's annoying and will tend to get your questions ignored by the people most likely to be able to help. On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 14:01:36 -0500 (CDT) Joe wrote: JC> When I run either of the following commands, 109 entries are retrieved JC> using the net-snmp agent r

Re: Slow Access to IP Interfaces Table

2004-10-29 Thread Thomas Anders
Joe Clark wrote: time snmpwalk -c public -v 2c localhost interfaces time snmpbulkwalk -C r30 -c public -v 2c localhost interfaces In either case the time elapsed is given as appx 2.5 seconds. tethereal shows the following packet sequence: What Net-SNMP version do you use? If it's 5.1.x or lower, p

Slow Access to IP Interfaces Table

2004-10-29 Thread Joe Clark
When I run either of the following commands, 109 entries are retrieved using the net-snmp agent running on a 1 GHZ, 256 MB RAM, Mandrake Linux 8.2 machine. time snmpwalk -c public -v 2c localhost interfaces time snmpbulkwalk -C r30 -c public -v 2c localhost interfaces In either case the time elap

Slow Access to IP Interfaces Table

2004-10-28 Thread Joe Clark
When I run either of the following commands, 109 entries are retrieved using the net-snmp agent running on a 1 GHZ, 256 MB RAM, Mandrake Linux 8.2 machine. time snmpwalk -c public -v 2c localhost interfaces time snmpbulkwalk -C r30 -c public -v 2c localhost interfaces In either case the time elap