Albert Chin wrote:
> Well, we rebuilt our 11.11 machine, applied the latest patches, and
> everything works now!
Are you speaking about HP or Net-SNMP patches? HP, I guess, I'm just
double-checking.
+Thomas
--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 12:55:55PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
> We've built net-snmp-5.3.1 on HP-UX 11.00/PA, 11.11/PA, 11.23/PA, and
> 11.23/IA. The snmpd.conf is:
> rouser public noauth
> rocommunity public
>
> We run snmpd as follows:
> # snmpd -f -Le -d
>
> An a RHEL 3/x86 machine we snm
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 06:21:13PM +0200, Thomas Anders wrote:
> Albert Chin wrote:
> > Ok, found the problem. Building net-snmp on HP-UX requires -lnm
> > (because -lnm provides open_mib() which files like
> > agent/mibgroup/mibII/at.c depend on). -lnm provides an implementation
> > of init_mib():
Albert Chin wrote:
> Ok, found the problem. Building net-snmp on HP-UX requires -lnm
> (because -lnm provides open_mib() which files like
> agent/mibgroup/mibII/at.c depend on). -lnm provides an implementation
> of init_mib():
> $ nm -BCpg /usr/lib/libnm.sl | grep init_mib
> 031096 T init_
Albert Chin wrote:
> Ok, found the problem. Building net-snmp on HP-UX requires -lnm
> (because -lnm provides open_mib() which files like
> agent/mibgroup/mibII/at.c depend on). -lnm provides an implementation
> of init_mib():
> $ nm -BCpg /usr/lib/libnm.sl | grep init_mib
> 031096 T init_
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 05:07:25PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 11:54:43PM +0200, Thomas Anders wrote:
> > Albert Chin wrote:
> > > It doesn't seem like, on 11.11, anything under $prefix/share/snmp/mibs
> > > is getting read. Running snmpd on 11.11 through tusc (HP-UX strace
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 11:54:43PM +0200, Thomas Anders wrote:
> Albert Chin wrote:
> > It doesn't seem like, on 11.11, anything under $prefix/share/snmp/mibs
> > is getting read. Running snmpd on 11.11 through tusc (HP-UX strace
> > equivalent), I get:
> > stat("${HOME}/.snmp/mibs/.index", 0x7ef
Albert Chin wrote:
> It doesn't seem like, on 11.11, anything under $prefix/share/snmp/mibs
> is getting read. Running snmpd on 11.11 through tusc (HP-UX strace
> equivalent), I get:
> stat("${HOME}/.snmp/mibs/.index", 0x7eff0dec) ERR#2 ENOENT
> stat("${HOME}/.snmp/mibs", 0x7eff0fd
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 03:44:18PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
> Where should I look?
One problem I'm seeing is that in find_tree_node() from
snmplib/parse.c:
headtp = tbuckets[NBUCKET(name_hash(name))];
for (tp = headtp; tp; tp = tp->next) {
I added the following after the for loop:
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 09:58:01PM +0100, Dave Shield wrote:
> On 20/10/06, Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > proxy_init: name = system
> > proxy: Unknown Object Identifier (system)
> > /tmp/snmp-test-45-29818/snmpd.conf: line 7: Error: illegal proxy oid
> > specified
>
>
> > Wher
On 20/10/06, Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> proxy_init: name = system
> proxy: Unknown Object Identifier (system)
> /tmp/snmp-test-45-29818/snmpd.conf: line 7: Error: illegal proxy oid
> specified
> Where should I look?
As a temporary workaround - try tweaking the files
testi
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 03:05:21PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 03:06:30PM +0200, Thomas Anders wrote:
> > Albert Chin wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 07:06:36AM +0100, Dave Shield wrote:
> > >> On 19/10/06, Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>> Other failures:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 03:06:30PM +0200, Thomas Anders wrote:
> Albert Chin wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 07:06:36AM +0100, Dave Shield wrote:
> >> On 19/10/06, Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Other failures:
> >>> 41: testing AgentX SET support... FAIL
> >>> 45: testing Prox
Albert Chin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 07:06:36AM +0100, Dave Shield wrote:
>> On 19/10/06, Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Other failures:
>>> 41: testing AgentX SET support... FAIL
>>> 45: testing Proxy GET support... FAIL
>>> 46: testing Proxy SET support... FAIL
>> Which
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 07:06:36AM +0100, Dave Shield wrote:
> On 19/10/06, Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Other failures:
> > 41: testing AgentX SET support... FAIL
> > 45: testing Proxy GET support... FAIL
> > 46: testing Proxy SET support... FAIL
>
> Which version of the agent
On 19/10/06, Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Other failures:
> 41: testing AgentX SET support... FAIL
> 45: testing Proxy GET support... FAIL
> 46: testing Proxy SET support... FAIL
Which version of the agent are you using?
If possible, it would be *extremely* useful to try running
Other failures:
41: testing AgentX SET support... FAIL
45: testing Proxy GET support... FAIL
46: testing Proxy SET support... FAIL
--
albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support
Albert Chin wrote:
> .1.3.6.1.2.1.25.3.2.1.1.1536 = INTEGER: 1536
> Timeout: No Response from [host]
Please run the agent under gdb and get us a backtrace ("bt" and "list") at this
point. Does it hang/loop or crash?
+Thomas
--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)
---
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 02:37:06PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 02:15:46PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 08:44:49PM +0200, Thomas Anders wrote:
> > > Albert Chin wrote:
> > > > We get no timeout errors on the HP-UX 11.00/PA, 11.23/PA, and
> > > > 11.23
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 02:15:46PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 08:44:49PM +0200, Thomas Anders wrote:
> > Albert Chin wrote:
> > > We get no timeout errors on the HP-UX 11.00/PA, 11.23/PA, and
> > > 11.23/IA hosts. However, snmpwalk always returns the following against
> > >
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 08:44:49PM +0200, Thomas Anders wrote:
> Albert Chin wrote:
> > We get no timeout errors on the HP-UX 11.00/PA, 11.23/PA, and
> > 11.23/IA hosts. However, snmpwalk always returns the following against
> > the 11.11/PA server:
> > ...
> > .1.3.6.1.2.1.25.3.2.1.1.1536 = IN
Albert Chin wrote:
> We get no timeout errors on the HP-UX 11.00/PA, 11.23/PA, and
> 11.23/IA hosts. However, snmpwalk always returns the following against
> the 11.11/PA server:
> ...
> .1.3.6.1.2.1.25.3.2.1.1.1536 = INTEGER: 1536
> Timeout: No Response from [host]
>
> Any ideas?
Does "mak
We've built net-snmp-5.3.1 on HP-UX 11.00/PA, 11.11/PA, 11.23/PA, and
11.23/IA. The snmpd.conf is:
rouser public noauth
rocommunity public
We run snmpd as follows:
# snmpd -f -Le -d
An a RHEL 3/x86 machine we snmpwalk the server:
$ /opt/TWWfsw/netsnmp53/bin/snmpwalk -v 1 -c public -On [ho
23 matches
Mail list logo