On Fri, 2006-03-03 at 09:46 -0500, Jean-Sebastien Morisset wrote:
> Excellent - thank you very much for your continued replies.
> I don't know where you find the time,
No - neither do I.
> In your example, would that mean a trap would never be sent,
> even if the "procfix" command failed?
Corr
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 02:32:11PM +, Dave Shield wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-03-03 at 08:47 -0500, Jean-Sebastien Morisset wrote:
>> This morning I found automountd down on a few servers, so I'm looking at
>> the "procfix" feature in snmpd.conf. The details on it's use are a
>> little sketchy. For e
On Fri, 2006-03-03 at 08:47 -0500, Jean-Sebastien Morisset wrote:
> This morning I found automountd down on a few servers, so I'm looking at
> the "procfix" feature in snmpd.conf. The details on it's use are a
> little sketchy. For example, is a trap sent for the failure, or is the
> "fix" applied
Hi everyone,
This morning I found automountd down on a few servers, so I'm looking at
the "procfix" feature in snmpd.conf. The details on it's use are a
little sketchy. For example, is a trap sent for the failure, or is the
"fix" applied first. Is a trap sent after the fix command? Here's my
relat
