2009/6/29 PoWah Wong :
> Adding the engineID to the 'createUser' line make the snmptrap v3 works.
> Thanks!
> createUser -e 0x0102030405 admin MD5 12345678 DES 87654321
>
> How do the snmptrapd know the engine ID of the sendtrap application?
The two sides of the conversation need to agree on the
--- On Sun, 6/28/09, Dave Shield wrote:
> From: Dave Shield
> Subject: Re: snmptrapd.conf: Error: bad security level (noauthnopriv,
> authnopriv, authpriv)
> To: "PoWah Wong"
> Cc: "net-snmp-users"
> Received: Sunday, June 28, 2009, 4:07 AM
> 2009/
2009/6/27 PoWah Wong :
> However, sending a v3 trap
> "snmptrap -e 0x0102030405 -v 3 -u admin -l auth -a MD5 -A 12345678
> 172.20.11.72 42 coldStart.0"
> or
> "snmptrap -e 0x0102030405 -v 3 -u admin 172.20.11.72 42 coldStart.0"
Note that these include an explicit engine ID
> do not see any
--- On Fri, 6/26/09, Dave Shield wrote:
> From: Dave Shield
> Subject: Re: snmptrapd.conf: Error: bad security level (noauthnopriv,
> authnopriv, authpriv)
> To: "PoWah Wong"
> Cc: "net-snmp-users"
> Received: Friday, June 26, 2009, 4:15 PM
> The -d
2009/6/26 PoWah Wong :
> However, with the "-d" option,
>"snmptrapd -f -C -c /home/powah/snmp/snmptrapd.conf -Lo -d"
> or
>"snmptrapd -Lf /home/powah/tmp/log.log -f -C -c
> /home/powah/snmp/snmptrapd.conf -d"
> see all traps displayed on the screen or in the log.log file.
What do you mean
> From: PoWah Wong [mailto:wong_po...@yahoo.ca]
> Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 9:47 AM
> snmptrapd.conf is as follows:
> createUser admin MD5 12345678 DES 87654321
> createUser adminwindows MD5 12345678 DES 87654321
>
> authuser log admin
> logOption s u
For v1/v2c, add "authCommunity lo
--- On Fri, 6/26/09, Dave Shield wrote:
> From: Dave Shield
> Subject: Re: snmptrapd.conf: Error: bad security level (noauthnopriv,
> authnopriv, authpriv)
> To: "PoWah Wong"
> Cc: "net-snmp-users"
> Received: Friday, June 26, 2009, 6:11 AM
> 2009/
2009/6/24 PoWah Wong :
>> Next - try sending the trap using
>>
>> snmptrap -e 0x0102030405 -v 3 -u admin -l
>> noauth 172.20.11.72 42 coldStart.0
>>
>> Do you see the trap logged or not?
>> If yes, what about
>>
>> snmptrap -e 0x0102030405 -v 3 -u admin -l
>> auth
--- On Wed, 6/24/09, Dave Shield wrote:
> From: Dave Shield
> Subject: Re: snmptrapd.conf: Error: bad security level (noauthnopriv,
> authnopriv, authpriv)
> To: "PoWah Wong"
> Cc: "net-snmp-users"
> Received: Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 10:27 AM
> 20
2009/6/24 PoWah Wong :
>> What happens if you replace the "authUser" line with an
>> entry
>>
>> disableAuthorization yes
>>
>> and restart the trap receiver (without the '-d' flag)
> My trap config file, restart the trap receiver but do not see traps logged:
Ok - so the problem is nothing
--- On Wed, 6/24/09, Dave Shield wrote:
> From: Dave Shield
> Subject: Re: snmptrapd.conf: Error: bad security level (noauthnopriv,
> authnopriv, authpriv)
> To: "PoWah Wong"
> Cc: "net-snmp-users"
> Received: Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 9:54 AM
> 200
trapd.conf: line 4: Error: bad security level
> (noauthnopriv, authnopriv, authpriv)
> /home/powah/snmp/snmptrapd.conf: line 4: Error: bad security level
> (noauthnopriv, authnopriv, authpriv)
As the error says, it's expecting a security level (noauth, etc),
rather than the name of a
--- On Wed, 6/24/09, Dave Shield wrote:
> From: Dave Shield
> Subject: Re: snmptrapd.conf: Error: bad security level (noauthnopriv,
> authnopriv, authpriv)
> To: "PoWah Wong"
> Cc: "net-snmp-users"
> Received: Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 3:26 AM
>
2009/6/23 PoWah Wong :
> I send a test trap with netsnmp 4.5.2.1 on FC6 linux as follows:
> snmptrap -e 0x0102030405 -v 3 -u admin -l authPriv -a MD5 -A 12345678 -x DES
> -X 87654321 172.20.11.72 42 coldStart.0
>
> The wireshark program running on 172.20.11.72 capture this trap.
> However, no trap
tration != duplicate" failed agent_registry.c:535
netsnmp_subtree_load()
netsnmp_assert !"registration != duplicate" failed agent_registry.c:535
netsnmp_subtree_load()
/home/powah/snmp/snmptrapd.conf: line 4: Error: bad security level
(noauthnopriv, authnopriv, authpriv)
/home/powah/snmp/
Hi,
How to mandate authPriv level of authentication while configuring/creating
V3/USM users using snmpusm command
OR createUser directive.
I want to restrict authNoPriv level for snmpget/sets.
Thanks,
Mahesh
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Hi,
Can we attach the level of authentication required for each
USM user for snmpgets/sets while creating USM users itself.
I created USM user with both Authentication/Privacy keys.
But using -l authNoPriv in snmpgets with correct
Authentication and Wrong Privacy keys are
17 matches
Mail list logo
