On 06/06/07, Adam Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My question is around what the net-snmp library expects back when the end of
> table is found - inside the get_next routine.
> It is tolerable to simple return NULL or must the put_index_data pointer
> require its fields to be NULL'd out as well (
Hi all,
I have been implementing iterate_access style tables for the last couple of
week. I coded up the last one today and it is behaving very oddly.
I have registered a get_first and get_next routine to iterate through the
tables.
My question is around what the net-snmp library expects bac