an outage.
"Brian A. Seklecki"
02/25/2009 07:28 PM
To
bechara.r...@sybase.com
cc
ben.tay...@sybase.com, gordon.dougl...@sybase.com,
net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject
Re: netsnmp-5.4.2.1 and Solaris 10/X86 with ZFS
Isn't the "##%" supposed to in
, bechara.r...@sybase.com,
gordon.dougl...@sybase.com
Subject
Re: netsnmp-5.4.2.1 and Solaris 10/X86 with ZFS
2009/2/25 :
> I have built a rather stock netsnmp-5.4.2.1 for our environment, and now
the
> local EM7 guy is complaining that our ZFS file system isn't getting
monitore
2009/2/25 :
> I have built a rather stock netsnmp-5.4.2.1 for our environment, and now the
> local EM7 guy is complaining that our ZFS file system isn't getting monitored
> like it should.
Which is/are the ZFS filesystem(s) ?
How big are they?
Note that the UCD disk group objects don't handle "l
ylor/SYBASE
02/25/2009 11:41 AM
To
net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
cc
Bechara Rizk/syb...@sybasenotes, Gordon Douglass/syb...@sybasenotes
Subject
netsnmp-5.4.2.1 and Solaris 10/X86 with ZFS
I have built a rather stock netsnmp-5.4.2.1 for our environment, and now
the local EM7
guy is co
Ben,
Your statement is correct.
Thanks
Ben Taylor/SYBASE
02/25/2009 11:41 AM
To
net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
cc
Bechara Rizk/syb...@sybasenotes, Gordon Douglass/syb...@sybasenotes
Subject
netsnmp-5.4.2.1 and Solaris 10/X86 with ZFS
I have built a rather stock netsnmp-5.4.2.1
I have built a rather stock netsnmp-5.4.2.1 for our environment, and now
the local EM7
guy is complaining that our ZFS file system isn't getting monitored like
it should.
Here's the basics from the snmpd.conf file:
disk /backup 95%
disk /opt 99%
After restarting snmpd, I get the following resp