As far as I can tell, the interfaces MIB doesn't have that counter.
Does anyone happen to know if there is another way (additional MIB?) of
getting hold of it?
thanks
Per Jessen
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (8.9°C)
--
For D
I rely on ifInDiscards and ifOutDiscards to report queue discards -- are
you looking for something different?
IF-MIB::ifInDiscards
guru> snmptranslate -Of -IR ifInDiscards
.iso.org.dod.internet.mgmt.mib-2.interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifInDiscards
guru>
--sk
Stuart Kendrick
FHCRC
On 4/6/2012 2:06
Stuart Kendrick wrote:
> I rely on ifInDiscards and ifOutDiscards to report queue discards -- are
> you looking for something different?
>
> IF-MIB::ifInDiscards
>
> guru> snmptranslate -Of -IR ifInDiscards
> .iso.org.dod.internet.mgmt.mib-2.interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifInDiscards
> guru>
>
> --
Ahh, I see. And I don't know the answer.
If you find out what kind of mapping exists between ifIn/OutDiscards and
dropped and/or overruns, I hope you'll post -- I would find it useful to
know this also
--sk
[...]
> I'm looking for the "overruns:" number as in the ifconfig display:
>
> # ifconfig
Stuart Kendrick wrote:
>> I'm looking for the "overruns:" number as in the ifconfig display:
>>
>> # ifconfig eth5
>> eth5 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:02:B3:8D:CF:F6
>> inet addr:212.25.11.138 Bcast:212.25.11.191
>> Mask:255.255.255.192
>> inet6 addr: fe80::202:b3ff:f
On 6 April 2012 14:49, Per Jessen wrote:
> I'm looking for the "overruns:" number as in the ifconfig display:
>
> # ifconfig eth5
> eth5 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:02:B3:8D:CF:F6
> RX packets:2799 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:20 errors:0 dropped:0
Dave Shield wrote:
> On 6 April 2012 14:49, Per Jessen wrote:
>> I'm looking for the "overruns:" number as in the ifconfig display:
>>
>> # ifconfig eth5
>> eth5 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:02:B3:8D:CF:F6
>> RX packets:2799 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>> TX packets:20 errors:0 d
On 10 April 2012 09:42, Per Jessen wrote:
>> It's a little difficult to be sure which zero corresponds with which,
>> but I strongly suspect that "overruns" in the ifconfig output
>> corresponds to the "fifo" field in /proc/net/dev
>
> It does, I can confirm that:
OK - then I think you're out of
Dave Shield wrote:
> On 10 April 2012 09:42, Per Jessen wrote:
>>> It's a little difficult to be sure which zero corresponds with
>>> which, but I strongly suspect that "overruns" in the ifconfig output
>>> corresponds to the "fifo" field in /proc/net/dev
>>
>> It does, I can confirm that:
>
> O
