I am attempting to use the RPM spec files from git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/net-snmpbased off some changes that I have made. The rpmbuild gets most of the way through and I see this error:RPM build errors: File must begin with "/": %{_unitdir}/snmp*Iam running this on CentOS 6.0, any ideas?
---
.sh /home/(xxdir=`pwd` && cd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
> && find usr/lib*/perl5 -type f | sed 's/^/\//' > $xxdir/net-snmp-perl-files)
>
>
>
>/usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh /home/rangeliNepal/rpm/BUILD/net-snmp-5.5
>
>
>
> /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp
lib*/perl5 -type f | sed 's/^/\//' > $xxdir/net-snmp-perl-files)
/usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh /home/rangeliNepal/rpm/BUILD/net-snmp-5.5
/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-compress
/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-static-archive /usr/bin/strip
/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-com
: rpm build
I am trying to build rpm for net-snmp 5.5 on a redhat 3 machine. I am using
spec file that came with net-snmp5.5 stored in dist directory.
Any clue will be highly appreciated.
Thank you.
rn
It exits at with message:
Warning: You do not have permissions to install into
`/home/sjha/rpm/BUILD/net-snmp-5.5/perl'
make: *** [perlinstall] Error 1
error: Bad exit status from /home/sjha/rpm/tmp/rpm-tmp.48839 (%install)
RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /home/sjha/rpm/tmp/rpm-tmp.48839 (%install)
If I look at the rpm-tmp.48839. I get following at the end:
On 01/10/09 11:11, Dave Shield wrote:
> I believe that at when we started, RedHat was still shipping the UCD version.
> so the RPM names were different anyway. And of course the RedHat/Fedora
> structure and naming conventions are different from the SuSE/Ubuntu ones.
> (And there may well be othe
2009/10/1 Robin Bowes :
>> That's correct - the Net-SNMP binary RPM-based distribution essentially
>> bundles all of the core functionality into a single RPM (i.e. net-snmp).
>> This covers what some other distributions (e.g. Fedora/RedHat) divide
>> between multiple RPMs.
>>
>
> Was there a partic
On 01/10/09 08:37, Dave Shield wrote:
>
> That's correct - the Net-SNMP binary RPM-based distribution essentially
> bundles all of the core functionality into a single RPM (i.e. net-snmp).
> This covers what some other distributions (e.g. Fedora/RedHat) divide
> between multiple RPMs.
>
Was ther
2009/10/1 Douglas Hussey :
> I am using Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.
> I need to rebuild the latest net-snmp-5.5 (rebuild the RPM) . However, after
> the rpm build process I only end up with:
> net-snmp-5.5-1.x86_64.rpm
> net-snmp-debuginfo-5.5-1.x86_64.rpm
> ne
I am using Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.
I need to rebuild the latest net-snmp-5.5 (rebuild the RPM) . However, after
the rpm build process I only end up with:
net-snmp-5.5-1.x86_64.rpm
net-snmp-debuginfo-5.5-1.x86_64.rpm
net-snmp-devel-5.5-1.x86_64.rpm
net-snmp-perlmods-5.5-1.x86_64
Thomas Anders wrote:
Bill Trost wrote:
> When I try to build an RPM on a PowerPC running Linux 2.4.25-ish, I end
up with the following jewel buried deeply in the rpm binary build output:
>
> File not found by glob: /tmp/net-snmp-root/usr/lib/*.so*
>
> Uh, where'd my ".s
example).
Does this also happen with a manual "./configure ... && make" build?
Wow -- no, it doesn't, and I'm using the configure command that the RPM build
prints out. I'll have t
Bill Trost wrote:
> I've been beating on this for about two days now: When I try to build an RPM
> on a PowerPC running Linux 2.4.25-ish, I end up with the following jewel
> buried deeply in the rpm binary build output:
>
> File not found by glob: /tmp/net-snmp-root/usr/lib/*.so*
>
> Sure eno
Hi, all,
I've been beating on this for about two days now: When I try to build an RPM on
a PowerPC running Linux 2.4.25-ish, I end up with the following jewel buried
deeply in the rpm binary build output:
File not found by glob: /tmp/net-snmp-root/usr/lib/*.so*
Sure enough, digging through t
I grabbed the 5.3.1 source and the net-snmp.spec file. I have
successfully built the rpm binaries on a RHEL v.3 box. The perl modules
were also built successfully, but at the very end of the build process I
receive a huge number of messages saying that "installed (but
unpackaged)" files we
15 matches
Mail list logo
