Jeddylyn A. Ortilla wrote:
> My question now is about the performance of snmptrap.
> -
> Test Environment:
>Net-SNMP 5.4.1
>OS: Linux RedHat AS3
>Machine: DellPowerEdge 750, 1GB RAM
>
> Result of sending of snmptrap: 8-10 traps / second.
> Note: snmpd and snmptrapd are runni
Hello
Good Day!
Thank you very much for your reply on my previous question.
My question now is about the performance of snmptrap.
-
Test Environment:
Net-SNMP 5.4.1
OS: Linux RedHat AS3
Machine: DellPowerEdge 750, 1GB RAM
Result of sending of snmptrap: 8-10 traps / second.
No
On 27/03/07, Alfredo Dimaunahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to confirm if the
> "--disable-mib-loading" in ./configure would give the same results as adding
> -m "" in the command.
Not exactly.
The command-line option -m "" means
"set the list of MIB
Hello,
I would like to give an update regarding the status of this one. Using the "-m
""" idea from Mr. Dave Shield, the performance of sending trap had greatly
improved. Here's the result of the "time" command:
with module loading:
real0m4.524s
user0m2.014s
sys 0m1.932s
without mo
On 18/01/07, Alfred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I noticed the delay (around 3 secs) in the embedded device when
> I send traps (using snmptrap). Is this normal?
Some delay is normal, as Wes and Thomas have indicated.
But 3s feels a bit excessive, IMO.
> Are there any methods on how to improve t
Alfredo Dimaunahan wrote:
> Regarding the "snmptrap" (not snmptrapd, right?) startup time, should we
> consider this a bug? Or will it be improved in next versions? I also tried it
> in net-snmp version 5.1.2 and same behavior was noticed.
No, this isn't a bug. There's significant startup "cost"
Thanks for the reply.
Regarding the "snmptrap" (not snmptrapd, right?) startup time, should we
consider this a bug? Or will it be improved in next versions? I also tried it
in net-snmp version 5.1.2 and same behavior was noticed.
Please note that I am only using SNMPv1. I will try to create a
> "A" == Alfred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
A> I tested net-snmp (5.4 + snmptrap patch) in a x86 machine (Dell
A> GX240) and an embedded device (mips architecture, 233 MHz CPU, 64MB
A> RAM). I noticed the delay (around 3 secs) in the embedded device
A> when I send traps (using snmptrap). Is t
Hello,
Good day.
I tested net-snmp (5.4 + snmptrap patch) in a x86 machine (Dell GX240) and an
embedded device (mips architecture, 233 MHz CPU, 64MB RAM). I noticed the delay
(around 3 secs) in the embedded device when I send traps (using snmptrap). Is
this normal? Are there any methods on how
