Re: v2 notifications as v1 traps

2008-09-10 Thread dan anderson
ge- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> Behalf Of dan anderson >> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 3:53 PM >> To: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> Subject: Re: v2 notifications as v1 traps >> >> Nobody knows? Hmm. Would any

RE: v2 notifications as v1 traps

2008-09-10 Thread Mike Ayers
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of dan anderson > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 3:53 PM > To: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: v2 notifications as v1 traps > > Nobody knows? H

Re: v2 notifications as v1 traps

2008-09-10 Thread dan anderson
net-snmp snmpd or I'd do it myself, obviously.) Cheers, -Dan 2008/9/10 dan anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > When sending v2 notifications as v1 traps, is it correct to set the > enterprise OID to the parent of the trap, the generic type to > enterprise, and the spe

v2 notifications as v1 traps

2008-09-10 Thread dan anderson
When sending v2 notifications as v1 traps, is it correct to set the enterprise OID to the parent of the trap, the generic type to enterprise, and the specific type to the last digit of the notification's oid? Eg. for ucdShutdown, would it be enterpriseOID: ucdavis.ucdTraps, generic: 6 (enter