[NetBehaviour] conceptuality and apologies all the way down

2017-10-22 Thread Alan Sondheim
I hesitate to bring up issues here which themselves are problematic, but here goes. First, to the extent that art is a Foucauldian discursive formation (at least as I taught it at RISD in the 70s), labor, in the form of reading/ writing/conversation/declamation/discourse is involved. Seco

Re: [NetBehaviour] Prospectus for nothing

2017-10-22 Thread Julian Le Saux via NetBehaviour
Thanks, Sophia - that looks like a really interesting project, and far more technically adept than anything that I could come up with. I'm hoping that Rob Myers can do all the clever Blockchain stuff for this one... Edward On 22/10/17 15:01, sophia kosmaoglou wrote: Hi Edward, See this scul

Re: [NetBehaviour] Prospectus for nothing

2017-10-22 Thread Annie Abrahams via NetBehaviour
Hi Edward and others, Who is the author of this piece, who is the "we" you mention? Stored art works only have value if the artist, who was thought to have made it, signed it and is listed well (sells well). Maybe think of becoming co-artist (Author) of the piece (as well as co-owner ? ) when bu

Re: [NetBehaviour] Prospectus for nothing

2017-10-22 Thread marc.garrett via NetBehaviour
Hi all, We'd love to answer this but as some of you nay know. We are moving the whole site, including this list over to 2 different servers, as well as having to redesign everything. It will all be there, fresh & scary tomorrow ;-) It's a gonna take couple of months to shift the archive totall

Re: [NetBehaviour] Prospectus for nothing

2017-10-22 Thread sophia kosmaoglou via NetBehaviour
Hi Edward, See this sculpture by Rachel Ara along similar lines, although it does exist and it doesn't use blockchain technology so far (but she's developing it all the time). Sophia On 22 October 2017 at 14:26, bjørn magnhildøen via NetBehaviour < netbehaviour@

Re: [NetBehaviour] Prospectus for nothing

2017-10-22 Thread bjørn magnhildøen via NetBehaviour
Hi Edward, Would you consider submitting it to http://noemata.net/aphantasia/ ?? I think it would fit the project well - it concerns existence/non-existence as an 'attribute' of an art-object. for example, an art-object may have existence as an attribute but without existing itself. blockchain is

[NetBehaviour] Prospectus for nothing

2017-10-22 Thread Edward Picot via NetBehaviour
Dear all, See what you think of the following: Works of art offer unparalleled opportunities for investors, both individual and corporate. They have proved their worth time and again as hedges against inflation. The only disadvantage is the physical work of art itself. Valuable

Re: [NetBehaviour] Netbehaviour has moved

2017-10-22 Thread Michael Szpakowski
I thought I felt a slight disturbance in the force From: ruth catlow To: netbehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2017 11:13 AM Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] Netbehaviour has moved You have been carried over :) On 22/10/17 10:13, Michael Szpakowski wrote:

Re: [NetBehaviour] Netbehaviour has moved

2017-10-22 Thread ruth catlow
You have been carried over :) On 22/10/17 10:13, Michael Szpakowski wrote: Exciting stuff! -looking forward to seeing the new site... Are we all automatically updated on the list or do we have to do anything? :) [I mean I'm guessing we need to *send* to the new address but do our registrati

Re: [NetBehaviour] Netbehaviour has moved

2017-10-22 Thread Michael Szpakowski
Exciting stuff! -looking forward to seeing the new site... Are we all automatically updated on the list or do we have to do anything? :)  [I mean I'm guessing we need to *send* to the new address but  do our registrations carry over...?] cheersMichael From: ruth catlow To: netbehaviour@li