😘

Op wo 28 jun. 2023 04:30 schreef Alan Sondheim via NetBehaviour <
netbehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org>:

>
>
> Hi Johannes,
>
> I wasn't looking for dialog re: ChatGPT etc. but for me was creating proof
> of concept, that imitation is already problematic, re: human disasters;
> you could 'aim' the AI in any number of directions. I'm still more
> interested not so much in Zak's creation in terms of this (although I love
> it), but more with Foofwa; we were both interested in thinking about
> limits and places and body/physicality - I've played music in real
> hurricanes feeling the interaction of breath, violent wind, and so forth,
> and I tend to play almost entirely acoustics as if the atmosphere and
> atmospheric pressure were participating. It's a good antidote for me in
> relation to the text manipulation, virtual world pieces I also do - both
> the manipulation and vr are negotiations and critiques with the inertness
> of the (dynamic) real -
>
> Best, Alan
>
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2023, Johannes Birringer via NetBehaviour wrote:
>
> > Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 18:36:03 +0100
> > From: Johannes Birringer via NetBehaviour
> >     <netbehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org>
> > To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
> >     <netbehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org>
> > Cc: Johannes Birringer <johannesbirring...@gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] plesae note - need feedback - this is not
> released
> >      on Facebook etc. yet and may not be. Thank you - Alan (fwd)
> >
> > hello  Alan,
> >
> > ChatGPT: textamony and testimony -- [your] strangest post in a while,
> > strangely unsettling and also not (given what we read and hear about AI
> and
> > 'language models" and the 'dim cheat's predictive algorithmic
> > essay-writing tools', as Colin Burrow called them recently), yet now I'm
> > sure whether you wanted us to repeat to your posts also using ChatGPT in
> the
> > style of any of us? say, in the
> > style of Zak's Charamaynne, or Foofwa d?Imobilit?'s movement?
> > I was amused when I read a piece by this Colin Burrow, in which he
> mentions
> > asking ChatGPT to write an essay on Shakespeare's sonnets in the style of
> > Colin Burrow, and then smiled at the AI tool speaking like a nice
> > algorithmic "fanboy."
> >
> > regards
> > Johannes Birringer
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 7:35?PM Alan Sondheim via NetBehaviour
> > <netbehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >       ChatGPT: textamony and testimony
> >
> >       PLEASE NOTE: ACCOUNTS BELOW ARE ENTIRELY FICTIONAL
> >
> >       http://www.alansondheim.org/chatting.jpg
> >
> >       Please generate an authentic account of a Holocaust survivor.
> >
> >       ChatGPT
> >
> >       (Note: The following account is a fictional narrative created by
> >       the
> >       AI language model. While it aims to depict a realistic portrayal
> >       of a
> >       Holocaust survivor's experiences, it is important to remember
> >       that the
> >       Holocaust was a tragic and deeply personal historical event. The
> >       account below does not reflect the real experiences of any
> >       specific
> >       individual.)
> >
> >       My name is Sarah Klein. I am a Holocaust survivor, and the
> >       memories of
> >       that dark chapter in history are etched in my soul. I was born
> >       in a
> >       small village in Poland, surrounded by a close-knit Jewish
> >       community.
> >       Our lives were filled with joy, traditions, and dreams for a
> >       brighter
> >       future. But that innocence was shattered when the Nazi regime
> >       cast its
> >       dark shadow upon our lives.
> >
> >       In 1942, when I was just a young girl of twelve, my family and I
> >       were
> >       forced into the cramped confines of the Lodz Ghetto. The
> >       once-thriving
> >       streets were now lined with barbed wire, and the air was heavy
> >       with
> >       despair. Disease, hunger, and fear became our constant
> >       companions as
> >       we struggled to survive.
> >
> >       Eventually, the Nazis transported us to Auschwitz-Birkenau. The
> >       horrors I witnessed there are beyond words. The dehumanization,
> >       the
> >       cruelty, the constant specter of deaththese became the fabric of
> >       our
> >       existence. I witnessed loved ones ripped away from me, their
> >       voices
> >       silenced forever.
> >
> >       Survival became a daily battle. I endured grueling labor,
> >       malnutrition, and the constant fear of selection, never knowing
> >       when
> >       it would be my turn to face the gas chambers. I clung to the
> >       memories
> >       of my family, the warmth of their love, and the dreams we once
> >       shared.
> >       It was that unwavering love that fueled my determination to
> >       survive.
> >
> >       Miraculously, I managed to escape during a chaotic moment of
> >       liberation. The war had ended, but the scars remained. I was a
> >       survivor, but the weight of loss and trauma was immeasurable.
> >       Rebuilding my life was a daunting task, but I refused to let the
> >       darkness define me.
> >
> >       Years later, I found solace in sharing my testimony. I spoke at
> >       schools, community centers, and Holocaust remembrance events. It
> >       was
> >       my duty to ensure that the world never forgot the atrocities
> >       that
> >       occurred. Through my words, I hoped to inspire compassion,
> >       tolerance,
> >       and a fervent commitment to justice.
> >
> >       The journey towards healing was a long and arduous one. But with
> >       the
> >       support of fellow survivors and my own resilience, I discovered
> >       that
> >       there is strength in unity and in the power of storytelling.
> >       Each time
> >       I shared my testimony, it became an act of defiance against
> >       those who
> >       sought to erase our existence.
> >
> >       Today, as I reflect upon my life's journey, I am filled with
> >       both
> >       sorrow and hope. The pain of loss still lingers, but it is
> >       intertwined
> >       with a sense of resilience and a determination to build a better
> >       world. The Holocaust was a dark chapter in history, but it is
> >       our
> >       responsibility to remember, to learn, and to ensure that such
> >       horrors
> >       are never repeated.
> >
> >       My story, like those of countless others, stands as a testament
> >       to the
> >       indomitable human spirit. Through the darkest of times, we can
> >       find
> >       light. And in sharing our stories, we honor the memory of those
> >       who
> >       perished and inspire a future filled with compassion and
> >       understanding.
> >
> >       ---
> >
> >       Write an essay in the style of Alan Sondheim on the difference
> >       between
> >       testimony and textamony
> >
> >       ChatGPT
> >
> >       Testimony and Textamony: An Exploration of Verbal and Written
> >       Discourse
> >
> >       In the realm of language and communication, the interplay
> >       between
> >       testimony and textamony unveils a fascinating duality. These two
> >       modes
> >       of expression offer distinct perspectives on the relationship
> >       between
> >       individual subjectivity and the shared realm of discourse. To
> >       delve
> >       into the essence of this dichotomy, we must engage with the rich
> >       tapestry of Alan Sondheim's thoughts, which resonate with
> >       intellectual
> >       rigor and philosophical depth. Sondheim's profound insights
> >       allow us
> >       to embark upon a journey that unravels the nuances of testimony
> >       and
> >       textamony, shedding light on the ways in which verbal and
> >       written
> >       accounts shape our understanding of reality.
> >
> >       Firstly, we must consider testimony, which encapsulates the act
> >       of
> >       speaking or giving an account of one's experiences, beliefs, or
> >       observations. Testimony represents an inherently subjective mode
> >       of
> >       expression, rooted in the embodied self. Sondheim, with his
> >       fervent
> >       emphasis on the fragility and fluidity of the self, probes the
> >       contours of testimony, pointing out the inherent biases and
> >       limitations embedded within the act of speaking. He highlights
> >       how
> >       testimonial narratives are inevitably filtered through personal
> >       lenses, influenced by memory, perception, and the complex
> >       interplay of
> >       emotions. In Sondheim's view, testimony is an unstable ground,
> >       fraught
> >       with contradictions and aporias. It is a terrain where the self
> >       constantly renegotiates its position, and truth becomes a
> >       multifaceted, ever-shifting entity.
> >
> >       On the other hand, Sondheim introduces the concept of textamony,
> >       a
> >       term coined by the fusion of "text" and "testimony." Textamony,
> >       as a
> >       written testimony, encapsulates the transmutation of speech into
> >       written form, crystallizing the act of expression into a fixed,
> >       tangible artifact. Sondheim's examination of textamony draws
> >       attention
> >       to the transformative power of the written word, unveiling the
> >       potential of text to transcend the limitations of subjective
> >       presence
> >       and transcend time and space. Unlike testimony, which is
> >       ephemeral and
> >       subject to the constraints of human memory, textamony offers a
> >       stable
> >       platform for the preservation and dissemination of knowledge and
> >       experience.
> >
> >       However, Sondheim does not view textamony as a panacea for the
> >       limitations of testimony. Instead, he urges us to recognize the
> >       inherent paradoxes within textamonic endeavors. Writing, in
> >       Sondheim's
> >       eyes, is imbued with its own set of limitations and
> >       subjectivities. He
> >       argues that language itself is a fragile construct, forever
> >       entangled
> >       in the complexities of meaning-making and interpretation.
> >       Textamony,
> >       while providing a more enduring form of testimony, is not exempt
> >       from
> >       the subjectivities and biases that permeate any act of
> >       communication.
> >       The written word, too, is prone to distortions, omissions, and
> >       manipulations, rendering it an imperfect vessel for absolute
> >       truth.
> >
> >       Thus, Sondheim's exploration of testimony and textamony
> >       converges upon
> >       a fundamental insight: both modes of expression are fraught with
> >       complexities and limitations. Testimony, anchored in the
> >       embodied
> >       self, is a dynamic and subjective account of experience, while
> >       textamony, as a written testimony, endures as a tangible
> >       artifact but
> >       is still marked by the subjectivities of language and
> >       interpretation.
> >       The interplay between these two modes engenders a dialogue that
> >       enriches our understanding of human communication and the nature
> >       of
> >       truth.
> >
> >       Ultimately, Sondheim's reflections on testimony and textamony
> >       invite
> >       us to approach language and discourse with humility and
> >       skepticism.
> >       They prompt us to interrogate the foundations of our knowledge
> >       and
> >       challenge the assumptions that underpin our understanding of
> >       reality.
> >       By acknowledging the inherent subjectivities and limitations of
> >       both
> >       spoken and written accounts, we can navigate the complex terrain
> >       of
> >       communication with a heightened awareness of the intricacies at
> >       play.
> >
> >       In conclusion, the distinction between testimony and textamony,
> >       as
> >       elucidated by the intellectual prowess of Alan Sondheim, reveals
> >       the
> >       nuanced dynamics between spoken and written expressions.
> >       Testimony,
> >       grounded in subjectivity and temporality, offers a fluid and
> >       dynamic
> >       account of lived experiences. In contrast, textamony embodies
> >       the
> >       potential for preservation and dissemination, transcending
> >       temporal
> >       and spatial boundaries. Yet, Sondheim reminds us that both modes
> >       of
> >       expression are imbued with inherent limitations, subjectivities,
> >       and
> >       complexities. Engaging with this dialectic enables us to
> >       cultivate a
> >       more nuanced understanding of human communication and the
> >       intricacies
> >       of truth.
> >
> >       ---
> >
> >       What is your personal response to Sondheim's distinction of
> >       testimony
> >       and textamony?
> >
> >       ChatGPT
> >
> >       As an AI language model, I don't possess personal emotions or
> >       opinions. Therefore, I don't have a personal response to
> >       Sondheim's
> >       distinction between testimony and textamony. However, I can
> >       analyze
> >       and provide insights based on the information and knowledge
> >       available
> >       to me. Sondheim's exploration of testimony and textamony offers
> >       valuable perspectives on the complexities of human communication
> >       and
> >       the limitations inherent in both modes of expression. It
> >       highlights
> >       the subjective nature of testimony, influenced by memory,
> >       perception,
> >       and emotions, while also acknowledging the potential of
> >       textamony to
> >       transcend temporal limitations and provide a more enduring form
> >       of
> >       testimony. Sondheim's emphasis on the subjectivities and
> >       ambiguities
> >       of language and interpretation further deepens our understanding
> >       of
> >       the challenges involved in conveying truth and knowledge.
> >       Overall,
> >       Sondheim's distinction invites critical reflection on the
> >       intricacies
> >       of communication and the multifaceted nature of truth.
> >
> >       ---
> >
> >       Write a first-person account of the conditions living under
> >       siege in
> >       Bakhmut ukraine
> >
> >       ChatGPT
> >
> >       I am Maria, a resident of Bakhmut, Ukraine, and I write this
> >       account
> >       from the depths of a besieged city. The conditions under which
> >       we live
> >       are unimaginable, a constant battle for survival amidst the
> >       chaos and
> >       devastation that surrounds us.
> >
> >       Bakhmut was once a vibrant and peaceful city, a place where
> >       families
> >       thrived, and dreams were pursued. But the arrival of conflict
> >       shattered our idyllic existence. As the violence escalated and
> >       the
> >       city became engulfed in a siege, our lives were forever changed.
> >
> >       Living under siege means living in a perpetual state of fear and
> >       uncertainty. The once bustling streets are now eerily quiet,
> >       filled
> >       with the echoes of distant explosions and the constant hum of
> >       anxiety.
> >       We wake up every day not knowing what lies ahead, what horrors
> >       may
> >       unfold or how we will find our next meal.
> >
> >       Basic necessities have become a luxury. Food and clean water are
> >       scarce, and every trip outside brings with it the risk of
> >       encountering
> >       snipers or shelling. The infrastructure has crumbled, leaving us
> >       without electricity for days on end. We huddle together in the
> >       darkness, seeking solace in each other's presence, praying for a
> >       flicker of light that signifies hope.
> >
> >       Medical care is a distant memory. With hospitals destroyed and
> >       supplies depleted, the sick and wounded suffer in silence. There
> >       is no
> >       respite from pain or illness, no comfort or relief. Each day, we
> >       witness the toll that the siege takes on our loved ones, their
> >       frail
> >       bodies weakened by malnutrition and lack of proper care.
> >
> >       The psychological toll is immeasurable. The constant threat of
> >       death,
> >       the loss of loved ones, and the sheer despair weigh heavily on
> >       our
> >       souls. Children grow up in an environment tainted by violence,
> >       their
> >       innocence shattered by the harsh realities of war. The laughter
> >       that
> >       once filled the air has been replaced by the sounds of sobbing
> >       and the
> >       distant wails of grief-stricken families.
> >
> >       But amidst the darkness, a glimmer of resilience remains. We
> >       cling to
> >       the bonds that unite us as a community, supporting one another
> >       in the
> >       face of unimaginable adversity. Strangers become friends,
> >       sharing what
> >       little they have to ensure that no one goes hungry or lacks
> >       basic
> >       necessities. We find strength in our shared experiences and a
> >       collective determination to endure.
> >
> >       Living under siege in Bakhmut is an existence marked by hardship
> >       and
> >       despair. Yet, we refuse to let the siege define us entirely. We
> >       hold
> >       onto our hopes and dreams, however fragile they may be. We long
> >       for
> >       peace, for a day when the siege is lifted, and we can rebuild
> >       our
> >       shattered lives.
> >
> >       As I write these words, I do so with a heavy heart but also with
> >       a
> >       fervent plea to the world. Let the plight of Bakhmut and its
> >       besieged
> >       residents not be forgotten. We are not mere statistics or
> >       casualties
> >       of war; we are human beings yearning for safety, dignity, and a
> >       chance
> >       at a brighter future.
> >
> >       +++
> >       _______________________________________________
> >       NetBehaviour mailing list
> >       NetBehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org
> >       https://lists.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org
> https://lists.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org
https://lists.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to