Yes Sent from jtwine.com
> On May 15, 2019, at 9:37 AM, Bjørn Magnhildøen via NetBehaviour > <netbehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org> wrote: > > sorry for x-posting > > preliminary call for VERY LARGE WORKS > > VVVVVVVV VVVVVVVVLLLLLLLLLLL WWWWWWWW > WWWWWWWW > V::::::V V::::::VL:::::::::L W::::::W > W::::::W > V::::::V V::::::VL:::::::::L W::::::W > W::::::W > V::::::V V::::::VLL:::::::LL W::::::W > W::::::W > V:::::V V:::::V L:::::L W:::::W WWWWW > W:::::W > V:::::V V:::::V L:::::L W:::::W W:::::W > W:::::W > V:::::V V:::::V L:::::L W:::::W W:::::::W > W:::::W > V:::::V V:::::V L:::::L W:::::W W:::::::::W > W:::::W > V:::::V V:::::V L:::::L W:::::W W:::::W:::::W > W:::::W > V:::::V V:::::V L:::::L W:::::W W:::::W W:::::W > W:::::W > V:::::V:::::V L:::::L W:::::W:::::W > W:::::W:::::W > V:::::::::V L:::::L LLLLLLW:::::::::W W:::::::::W > V:::::::V LL:::::::LLLLLLLLL:::::L W:::::::W W:::::::W > V:::::V L::::::::::::::::::::::L W:::::W W:::::W > V:::V L::::::::::::::::::::::L W:::W W:::W > VVV LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL WWW WWW > WWW WWW > > VERY LARGE WORKS is an online show (pavilion) at The Wrong art biennale > 2019-2020, organised by Noemata group. > > the call consists of this intro and some (curatorial) questions. you can take > part in the show by submitting more questions or by submitting work related > to the questions. in other words, you can participate as curator posing > questions, or as artist submitting works to questions. > > now, can we also pose a question whether the question itself is a work, and > vice versa, whether a submitted work itself is a question? this is left as a > question also for now. > > then, what is a good platform for this? would a bulletin board or email-list > do? we'd love to give life to other web protocols and practises, free from > commercial clutter, abide with a vision closer to the original internet. > > the project concerns internet curatorship as much as 'very large works'. it > could be called Very Collaborative-Discursive Thing perhaps. our goal is > seeing if this form of show could develop into a more general practise within > the entangled netbased- art and curatorship pair. > > > IF ARE YOU INTERESTED IN PARTICIPATING (non-bindingly) in the show simply > comment yes to this post, or reply 'very large works' to m...@noemata.net. > the purpose is, besides probing interest, to drop a few names into an > application to get the project funded (with the help of God). > > > > VERY LARGE WORKS preliminary questions > > how large? > what are the extensions of an artwork? > does it have any? did art invent the zero yet? or negative dimensions? > one mole of elephants? > since we can script electrons, that's different from counting? > what about in-between dimensions? > who told you it was visible, countable, accountable? > the monitor is merely a - monitor? > ... that admonishes, cautions, of matters of conduct? > is a very large work still a work? > does it want to be a work? > is work endless work, Sisyphus? > is it perhaps too romantic, or is it just lack of imagination? > inherent lack? > isn't imagination too tacky, just imagine? > and cognition, its own? > boundaries - when will it take on its own? > circuits, morphology? > what about a six-dimensional work with unknown extensions? > as a matter of fact? > the home of time? > where would they fit, the very large works? > isn't very large more like muscle, and work again? > penis enlargement? > largus copious? > then you have copy and number, ennumeration, infinity or cost? > as you approach lim, inf? > it certainly isn't infinite, it's most definitely finite? > what about tactility and number? > abstract numbers close at hand? > numbers and money (mcluhan)? > "sure, sure"? > "The result hammered for a mountain-scene panorama measuring over 8 meters > wide and 3 meters high - The Grand Fucking Mountains (2019) - illustrates the > immense success of this new giant of et cetera"? > if you're a great artist.. a great artist makes great artworks? > now with internet we can also make VERY LARGE works? > couple it with art marked finance, whitewashing, scams, and what have you? > physicality seems to.. and the virtual-real? > are very large works also very tiny works? > what about zooming? > inside - outside, can you always zoom into and outof? > can a zoom substitute different domains of knowledge into one zoomable > territory? > also recursion is the devil, chain reaction, link reaction? > anything that, which is most things, as counting +1? > large and scarce > grasp our current love of numbers and quantitative information? > extension of our senses, sounds ominous, numinous? > the extension is of the same, just look at a postcard? > the news is the most trite thing there is? > how many days have you lived? > then how many did you skip? > nights? > can you even trust your senses, less the extensions? > and trust your trust, judgement? > the agreeable, the beautiful, the sublime, and the good? > unknown universals for given particulars? > subjective universal oxymoronic? > tasteless? > the strong taste of nothing? > your lightyear or mine? > now thoughts can be tactile-erectile? > what about lard, very lard? > why did you ever want to think? > two deserts - one empty, one full? > and digestion, not the least? > the schematas from table of judgement, delicious fruit? > duration, just imagine, no, just feel, no, just be, no, just, obdure? > that's on a cliff? > mirror, mirror on the wall? > on both sides? > head over heels? > the somerzsault of reflection, why is the left right? > is it biodegradable? > only if we die? > under the wrapping on a summer breeze? > cc: coco chanel? > copious fragrance disseminate, when will art smell? > bcc: blind coco chanel? > are the senses extensions at all, or rather indentations? > ye olde intentionality? > are there any gifts left? > exit shop to the right? > > > > preliminary participants > > Denise Kehoe, Eurico Sá Fernandes, Christian Blom, Antoine Schmitt, Igor and > Ivan Buharov, Termodress (Christian Bøen), Kira Simon-Kennedy, AP Vague, > Xiaoyao Xu, Ana Buigues, Zsolt Mesterhazy, Natalia Matta-Landero, Dirk > Vekemans, Maja kalogera, Gottfried Haider, Douglas Repetto, Nina Sobell, > Simon Perathoner, Joseph Moore, www PerfectUsersCollective, Ada Ortega > Camara, Alexander Ness, ronnie s, David Quiles Guilló, irena kalodera, daria > baiocchi, Lanny Quarles, Jukka-Pekka Kervinen, Andreas Maria Jacobs, Julia E > Dyck, Yiorgos Chouliaras, Jim Andrews, Harvey Lev, Dominik Podsiadly, Elle > Thorkveld, nigel roberts, Simon Biggs, Vivian Cintra > > > notes > > for VLW i was thinking people can either submit questions and/or works, so > that a participant can not only 'submit' work to a set of curating > rules/questions, but also add to or change them. in this case a participant > can submit a curatorial thing as work, forming a contradiction to the > either/or. > i had https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nomic in mind, a rule-changing game, but > with art it's more like questions and probes, one 'object of perception' > leading to another. > so on second thought, and closer to nomic, one could perhaps take part with > art _as_curatorial also? so you submit TO a rule or submit A rule. it would > be a Very Collaborative-Discursive Thing.. the title VLW now seems to slide > into the background, but again, the theme is the main thing holding it > together, the one thing that can't be changed. maybe this form of show could > develop into a more general stance on net curatorship? > what if we further say that input/moves/actions are treated as both works AS > rule and work FROM rule? how would that affect? where are we floating? > next question, what is a good platform for this? > would a bulletin board be a good platform, an email-list? > also to give life to older web protocols, free from commercial clutter, the > vision of the internet > > notes to fund application > > would be decent to be able to give participants something for their work. > > > > resources > > https://noemata.net > https://thewrong.org > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nomic > https://boingboing.net/2017/08/25/person-tests-amazons-unlim.html > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klGoP04C-WY > http://awp.diaart.org/km/painting.html > http://clickmonkeys.com/ > _______________________________________________ > NetBehaviour mailing list > NetBehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org > https://lists.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
_______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list NetBehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org https://lists.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
