Re: [NetBehaviour] Prospectus for nothing

On Fri, 27 Oct 2017, Julian Le Saux via NetBehaviour wrote: Ruth and all, I've been doing some more thinking. I kind of agree with Alan that you don't actually want to make any money out of selling shares in nothing - otherwise you're participating in the process you're pretending to satirize.

Re: [NetBehaviour] Prospectus for nothing

Ruth and all, I've been doing some more thinking. I kind of agree with Alan that you don't actually want to make any money out of selling shares in nothing - otherwise you're participating in the process you're pretending to satirize. On the other hand the whole point of the satire is that the

Re: [NetBehaviour] Prospectus for nothing

Dear Edward an all! Love the context setting here - the physical artwork as a tiresome encumbrance for investors and its eventual disappearance as an attractive feature for potential collectors. Then some responses to your proposal Re: presentation - Furtherfield would consider presenting no

Re: [NetBehaviour] Prospectus for nothing

Thanks, Sophia - that looks like a really interesting project, and far more technically adept than anything that I could come up with. I'm hoping that Rob Myers can do all the clever Blockchain stuff for this one... Edward On 22/10/17 15:01, sophia kosmaoglou wrote: Hi Edward, See this scul

Re: [NetBehaviour] Prospectus for nothing

Hi Edward and others, Who is the author of this piece, who is the "we" you mention? Stored art works only have value if the artist, who was thought to have made it, signed it and is listed well (sells well). Maybe think of becoming co-artist (Author) of the piece (as well as co-owner ? ) when bu

Re: [NetBehaviour] Prospectus for nothing

lished: Artists Re:thinking the Blockchain Eds, Ruth Catlow, Marc Garrett, Nathan Jones, & Sam Skinner Liverpool Press - http://bit.ly/2x8XlMK Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email. > Original Message ---- > Subject: [NetBehaviour] Prospectus for nothing

Re: [NetBehaviour] Prospectus for nothing

Hi Edward, See this sculpture by Rachel Ara along similar lines, although it does exist and it doesn't use blockchain technology so far (but she's developing it all the time). Sophia On 22 October 2017 at 14:26, bjørn magnhildøen via NetBehaviour < netbehaviour@

Re: [NetBehaviour] Prospectus for nothing

Hi Edward, Would you consider submitting it to http://noemata.net/aphantasia/ ?? I think it would fit the project well - it concerns existence/non-existence as an 'attribute' of an art-object. for example, an art-object may have existence as an attribute but without existing itself. blockchain is

[NetBehaviour] Prospectus for nothing

Dear all, See what you think of the following: Works of art offer unparalleled opportunities for investors, both individual and corporate. They have proved their worth time and again as hedges against inflation. The only disadvantage is the physical work of art itself. Valuable