- Original Message
From: dave miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, 16 July, 2008 6:47:59 PM
> I think my issue is with copyright and I misunderstood at first
> thinking Markus was copyrighting the idea.
Dave, you seem to misunderstand the nature of copyright. Ideas cannot be
Thanks for the link to wefeelfine Pall, that's a really nice work.
I agree artists can't list their inspirations for each project, and
often are unaware of what's been done before, and I'm guilty of that.
For example sadly I wasn't aware of wefeelfine, but I feel my work
would have been much more
No no no. That's going to get really hairy really quick. Demanding that
all artists list their inspirations for every work of art they produce
is very unrealistic. Inspiration isn't something that's necessarily
recorded or even something that happens consciously. Also, Markus' site
does state v
Hi Markus
I understand - you're not copyrighting the idea. It would help if you
made this clear on your site, as it gives the impression that your
project is your original idea, and this is what you're copyrighting.
I think your idea is very similar to mine from a couple of years back,
in my news
-- Forwarded message --
From: Markus Kison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2008/7/16
Subject: Re: Fwd: [NetBehaviour] pulsating emotion organism.
To: dave miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is complety correct the CC licencse is meant for the
documentation material. T
- Original Message
From: dave miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, 16 July, 2008 9:20:21 AM
> Why copyright pictures, text, video?
Copyright is automatic and universal. If the creator wishes the right can be
withdrawn.
Bob
___
Hi Pall
Well spotted - I didn't see that- so it looks like only "pictures,
text, video" are copyrighted, and not the concept or idea. Why
copyright pictures, text, video?
dave
2008/7/15 Pall Thayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> If the CC license is meant to apply to the work itself, then it's a flawed
>
