first, i am not insulting anyone on the list. i stated that the text WAS NOT
written for a 5th. grade class (so why treat it like it was). i'm guessing that
Rob (and everyone else on the list) understood quite well what was being said
in the initial post - perhaps a bit wordy for the taste of so
Superbly put Rob. Bravo ! m.
Rob Myers wrote:
> Art *is* the specialised language.
> Being smart at medicine is no good when a car won't start. But being
> good at quoting Theory is good no matter what, apparently, much like the
> transferable skills of management. The idea that Theory is the p
wauw
I agree
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Rob Myers wrote:
> Art *is* the specialised language.
>
> Being smart at medicine is no good when a car won't start. But being
> good at quoting Theory is good no matter what, apparently, much like the
> transferable skills of management. The idea t
Art *is* the specialised language.
Being smart at medicine is no good when a car won't start. But being
good at quoting Theory is good no matter what, apparently, much like the
transferable skills of management. The idea that Theory is the proper
domain language of art is one that needs "problemat
i proof and edit arts text (mostly translated or written by foreign
speakers (Russian, Spanish, Austrian, Italian, Hungarian) quite often
and have been since 2004.
happy to look over things for the sake of culture, if you ever want
to send anything by - incidentally, not that i find it diffi
Please, stop insisting upon our insistence. And really, there's no need
to insult those of us who don't find it easy to understand the
particular complex language in question by implying (as I see it) that
we're at the mental level and have the attitude to learning of, a
particular set of 5th grade
