exist.pl now listens for possible communication attempts from others. While
exist.pl is running, it is possible to telnet to the process, either
remotely or locally on tcp port 8181 and send it a message. Upon receiving
the message exist.pl will terminate the connection as it thinks about what
was
unday, 27 July, 2008 2:03:53 AM
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] New developments - On Being/"exist.pl"
Hi Bob,
It's not a virus that you can't get rid of. It will only recreate itself if you
delete it while it's running. If you delete it while it's not running, it's
tion
> sounds a bit like a virus that I may never be able to get rid of!!...
>
> - Original Message
> From: Pall Thayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, 25 July, 2008 9:06:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] New developments - On Being/"exist.pl"
>
&g
aviour] New developments - On Being/"exist.pl"
Well, on the screen you don't see anything happen (that's why I warned jwm not
to be disappointed). Once you give the command, it starts running so it drops
from the command prompt but doesn't give you another because it's
Well, on the screen you don't see anything happen (that's why I warned jwm
not to be disappointed). Once you give the command, it starts running so it
drops from the command prompt but doesn't give you another because it's
going through a consistent loop that is maintained by the existence of the
e
Pall,
What's happens when you run exist.pl?
I don't know anything about programming, but the recent exchange of ideas
around your code has been the highlight for me since joining the list. Best has
been the palpable shared sense of excitement in exploring a perceived 'state of
being' and tryin
OK, don't be disappointed when you do run it. Keep in mind that it's an
"introspective" exercise on the part of the software.
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 6:12 PM, james jwm-art net <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I was not so much thinking in terms of networks involving other
> computers, more splitting
I was not so much thinking in terms of networks involving other
computers, more splitting the parts of the program up (or potential
parts) so they can comunicate with each other and respawn dead
processes, I suppose roughly analogous to sensing processes and a brain
process, perhaps allowing the se
ps. Just out of curiosity. Has anyone actually tried running exist.pl on
their own computer? It should run on any Mac OS X or Linux computer (or
any *nix variation). I'd be interested in hearing what people think.
For those unfamiliar with Perl scripts, simply copy and paste the code
into a tex
james jwm-art net wrote:
> Just a quick thought:
>
> how about a client/server model? so there could be several components
> communicating with each other?
>
Actually, I see that as a later step. The program will eventually want
to explore outer space and that's where networking can come into t
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 12:44 PM, james jwm-art net <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just a quick thought:
>
> how about a client/server model? so there could be several components
> communicating with each other?
Or peer-to-peer, for a more equal society. ;-)
- Rob.
_
Just a quick thought:
how about a client/server model? so there could be several components
communicating with each other?
On 25/7/2008, "Pall Thayer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> We do not create the structure of our own brains, we receive their
>> design via evolution (or from God, but ei
> We do not create the structure of our own brains, we receive their
> design via evolution (or from God, but either way we don't make them
> ourselves). But we eventually take credit for using them.
>
> The structure of a neural net isn't determined by the program itself
> either. *Legally* the p
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Pall Thayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> Is it worth adding a simple neural net so the program can draw its own
>>> conclusions? :-)
>
> But see, that's where things begin to get really hairy. Would such
> conclusions really be the program's conclusions? Wouldn
clemos wrote:
> Hi
>
> Maybe you should execute it again, in the end, with "eval" or something ?
> Its temporary inexistance would be something more like a sleep, and
> the end of your program its awakening.
> Its death would not be the "end of program" anymore, but rather an
> external signal (kil
>> Is it worth adding a simple neural net so the program can draw its own
>> conclusions? :-)
>>
>>
But see, that's where things begin to get really hairy. Would such
conclusions really be the program's conclusions? Wouldn't it be more
accurate to say that they were my conclusions? I've go
Hi
Maybe you should execute it again, in the end, with "eval" or something ?
Its temporary inexistance would be something more like a sleep, and
the end of your program its awakening.
Its death would not be the "end of program" anymore, but rather an
external signal (kill) or the consequence of an
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 2:31 AM, Pall Thayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just finished revising the exist.pl program. Elements of awareness are
> now stored, much more logically, in a multidimensional hash variable called
> "awareness". That way it can carry the different values in a named f
We have major, major breakthroughs, people. I've decided to start a new
thread since the old one was getting too long.
I've just finished revising the exist.pl program. Elements of awareness are
now stored, much more logically, in a multidimensional hash variable called
"awareness". That way it ca
19 matches
Mail list logo
