On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 09:25:14PM +0100, Gerard Lally wrote:
> You could also consider the following alternatives, which are
> maintained: aria2; curl; wget.
I am aware of curl and wget. But I don't think they are accelerators like
aget.
Will try out aria2.
Mayuresh.
On Tue, 4 Jun 2013 22:26:03 +0530
Mayuresh wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 06:42:12PM +0200, Alistair Crooks wrote:
> > I don't see any updates to the package (beyond ones dealing with
> > pkgsrc infrastructure) since its import:
> >
> > so maybe things have just moved on for them?
>
> Looks li
Konrad Neuwirth writes:
> | pinie# sysctl -w kern.mbuf.nmbclusters=32768
> | sysctl: kern.mbuf.nmbclusters: Invalid argument
>
> No. The only result that doesn't produce an Invalid argument is … 16384.
>
> What can I do?
>
> This is a NetBSD/i386 machine with 2GB physical RAM.
Probably you a
Hey David,
On 04/06/2013 21:20, David Wetzel wrote:
>
> XBMC is now at version 12.2. How about trying that?
> They fixed a lot of issues on the mac version so I guess some of that will
> affect the build on BSD too?
well, good to know, but I do not have the time/motivati
Hi Pierre!
XBMC is now at version 12.2. How about trying that?
They fixed a lot of issues on the mac version so I guess some of that will
affect the build on BSD too?
Thanks
David
On 4 Jun 2013, at 15:13, Pierre Pronchery wrote:
>
> IIRC I never got it to compile all the way through back the
Hi David,
On 04/06/2013 18:05, David Wetzel wrote:
>
> is anybody using XBMC on NetBSD?
> It does not seem to be in pkgsrc, but it seems to be in pkgsrc wip.
I am the one who tried to package it in wip, about three years ago.
> How good does it work compare to the mac os
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 12:46:46PM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> Basically, NTP (ntpd and ntpdate) assume that the mean of the outgoing
> and incoming local timestamps (in the local machine's time) is the same
> time as the mean of the remote machines incoming and outgoing timestamps
> (in the rem
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 06:42:12PM +0200, Alistair Crooks wrote:
> I don't see any updates to the package (beyond ones dealing with
> pkgsrc infrastructure) since its import:
>
> so maybe things have just moved on for them?
Looks like ... thanks for the findings.
Anyway, the tool is really nice
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 11:24:49AM -0500, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jun 2013, Petar Bogdanovic wrote:
>
> > # ls -la /path/to/6.0.1/usr/bin/passwd
> > -r-xr-xr-x 3 root wheel 31003 Mar 6 13:35
> > /path/to/6.0.1/usr/bin/passwd
> > # ls -la /path/to/6.0.2/usr/bin/passwd
> >
quick question - should I be able to use /usr/bin/cpp -E without having
installed the compiler binary set? So far on this 5.1.2 host I've got
the base and etc sets installed and when trying to use cpp as a pre-processor
only, I get the following:
Without the compiler set, you should not e
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 06:51:47PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> I find net/aget - a download accelerator - suitable for my download
> requirement.
>
> I just find that, the command line option to provide a different local
> filename to the downloaded file (-l) does not work.
>
> I can perhaps write a
tlaro...@polynum.com writes:
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 11:20:21AM +, Michael van Elst wrote:
>>
>> NTP doesn't use ICMP but UDP and client and servers exchange time
>> information directly within the NTP protocol. The gateway is
>> nothing more than a router in the path that causes some dela
On Tue, 4 Jun 2013, Petar Bogdanovic wrote:
> # ls -la /path/to/6.0.1/usr/bin/passwd
> -r-xr-xr-x 3 root wheel 31003 Mar 6 13:35
> /path/to/6.0.1/usr/bin/passwd
> # ls -la /path/to/6.0.2/usr/bin/passwd
> -r-sr-xr-x 2 root wheel 31003 Jun 3 14:21
> /path/to/6.0.2/u
Hey folks,
is anybody using XBMC on NetBSD?
It does not seem to be in pkgsrc, but it seems to be in pkgsrc wip.
How good does it work compare to the mac os versions?
Thanks!
David
On Tue, 4 Jun 2013 16:27:37 +0200
Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> how persistent are autoconfigured raidframe device names?
>
> I'm asking because I mistakenly created a (onedisk) raid0 for system
> on a new, bigger disk, then created a new one (raid2) on the slightly
> older, former cold b
Hi,
how persistent are autoconfigured raidframe device names?
I'm asking because I mistakenly created a (onedisk) raid0 for system
on a new, bigger disk, then created a new one (raid2) on the slightly
older, former cold backup disk and added the new disk (after
unconfiguring the old one). Will ra
Hi,
not sure what happened here but after the upgrade from 6.0.1_PATCH to
6.0.2 the daily insecurity mail reported the following:
Checking setuid files and devices:
Setuid additions:
-r-sr-xr-x 2 root wheel 31003 Jun 3 12:21:03 2013 /usr/bin/passwd
-r-sr-xr-x 2 roo
So the kernel tells me again:
| WARNING: mclpool limit reached; increase kern.mbuf.nmbclusters
| WARNING: mclpool limit reached; increase kern.mbuf.nmbclusters
| WARNING: mclpool limit reached; increase kern.mbuf.nmbclusters
| WARNING: mclpool limit reached; increase kern.mbuf.nmbclusters
| WARNI
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 03:13:10PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
>
> If your NAT device causes persistent enough packet handling delays in the
> order of 2 seconds (or enough to make NTP erroneously drift that far),
> you have a serious problem.
>[...]
> What timecounter source did your machine p
I find net/aget - a download accelerator - suitable for my download
requirement.
I just find that, the command line option to provide a different local
filename to the downloaded file (-l) does not work.
I can perhaps write a wrapper script to work around the issue, though just
thought of checkin
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 03:05:21PM +0200, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
> The question arised because I have bad values (more than 2 seconds
> offset) for a node on which I have made a "ntpdate -b" (so no adjtime) a
> day before: the (new, dual-core x86_64, NetBSD 6.1) PC clock is not an
> atomic clo
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 11:20:21AM +, Michael van Elst wrote:
>
> NTP doesn't use ICMP but UDP and client and servers exchange time
> information directly within the NTP protocol. The gateway is
> nothing more than a router in the path that causes some delay,
> with NAT or without.
>
OK. But
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 10:07:03PM +1000, mjch wrote:
> Wouldn't that make having /usr/bin/cpp in any set other than comp a little
> pointless?
>
If it depends on the compiler, as it is perfectly allowed, yes. This
only means that a cpp outside the comp set has to be standalone. But
this does no
tlaro...@polynum.com writes:
>If I understand correctly, the time offset are computed taking into
>account the time the ICMP messages spent going from a time server to the
>client requesting it. But does a NAT rewrite happening in between have
>an impact on this computation? since both ends are u
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 02:26:55PM +1000, Malcolm Herbert wrote:
> quick question - should I be able to use /usr/bin/cpp -E without having
> installed the compiler binary set? So far on this 5.1.2 host I've got
> the base and etc sets installed and when trying to use cpp as a pre-processor
> only,
Hello,
If I understand correctly, the time offset are computed taking into
account the time the ICMP messages spent going from a time server to the
client requesting it. But does a NAT rewrite happening in between have
an impact on this computation? since both ends are unaware of the
masquerading
26 matches
Mail list logo
