Re: WARNING pseudorandom rekeying

2013-12-28 Thread Emmanuel Dreyfus
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 03:05:12AM +0100, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote: > It means that the RNG was seeded with a (supposedly) bad state, e.g. > with not enough random bits to be deemed safe. > > It is generally not safe to keep long term keys generated during > that state. IMO there is something to fi

Re: WARNING pseudorandom rekeying

2013-12-28 Thread Jean-Yves Migeon
Le 21/12/2013 16:06, Emmanuel Dreyfus a écrit : I have that messages on an i386 6.1.2 Xen machine: cprng cpu0-short: WARNING pseudorandom rekeying. cprng 47814d1: WARNING pseudorandom rekeying. cprng sysctl: WARNING pseudorandom rekeying. What does it means? I just upgraded the kernel to 6.1.2 t

Re: Wi-fi problems with channel 12

2013-12-28 Thread Martin Husemann
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 09:32:20AM +, Ottavio Caruso wrote: > By the way I'm in the Netherlands and my laptop was bought in the UK and I > believe channels 1-13 are available in Europe. Some drivers have sysctl nodes to controll this, e.g. ath has hw.ath.countrycode and hw.ath.regdomain. The

Re: Wi-fi problems with channel 12

2013-12-28 Thread Ottavio Caruso
On 28 December 2013 00:49, jscottkas...@yahoo.com wrote: > Hi. Wifi equipment destined for the US market must have a hardware, > firmware, or driver software lock on channels 12 and 13 , which are not > licensed in the US. I have a felling that tje firmware for that device must > implement a US/no

Re: Wi-fi problems with channel 12

2013-12-28 Thread Brett Lymn
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 09:39:38AM +, Ottavio Caruso wrote: > > I don't think so, I think the limitation is in either the iwn(4) or > the ath(4) driver. If it was in the firmware why would it work > straight ouf the box in Windows? > The operating system downloads the firmware to iwn as part

Re: Wi-fi problems with channel 12

2013-12-28 Thread Ottavio Caruso
On 28 December 2013 00:30, Greg Troxel wrote: > You don't mention where you are, and if 12 is an authorized channel > there. I'm in the Netherlands, channels 1-13 are authorized here. > > You can read the soruce code, but I would be surprised if this is > hardcoded in NetBSD. I would think it

Re: some keys not seen in xev(1) when pressed in combination with both Alt_L and Alt_R

2013-12-28 Thread Brett Lymn
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 02:32:33PM -0600, David Young wrote: > > Wow. I thought that n-key rollover was standard behavior since the > 1980s! > Nope, blame everyone for the race to the bottom cut every corner you can design. To do true n-rollover you need to isolate the keys from each other, th