On 2014-09-05 04:00, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
Hello Mayuresh Kathe,
You may be interested in ideas from MirBSD, they run for 10 years
without C++ in base.
yes, i have heard of them, and interacted with thorsten regarding mksh,
seemed like a good guy.
i am also drawing inspiration from openbsd,
On 2014-09-05 02:34, Matt Thomas wrote:
On Sep 4, 2014, at 10:34 AM, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
hello,
due to unforeseen circumstances, i need to cut down on my budget for a
machine to run netbsd on.
How much of a budget?
us$330.
intended use of the machine;
1. re-write as many of the base
Hello Mayuresh Kathe,
You may be interested in ideas from MirBSD, they run for 10 years without C++
in base.
There is mostly no low-power minimum, just get something usable, more power
will help you.
I like your idea of PCC and ANSI C. I think that NetBSD needs more features not
reworked thin
On Sep 4, 2014, at 10:34 AM, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
> hello,
>
> due to unforeseen circumstances, i need to cut down on my budget for a
> machine to run netbsd on.
How much of a budget?
> intended use of the machine;
> 1. re-write as many of the base tree c++ tools/utils in c89 as required fo
hello,
due to unforeseen circumstances, i need to cut down on my budget for a
machine to run netbsd on.
intended use of the machine;
1. re-write as many of the base tree c++ tools/utils in c89 as required
for a functional system.
2. work at getting as much of a functional system as possible u
