Re: ASMedia 6201 AHCI boot failure

2015-03-31 Thread Matt Thomas
> On Mar 31, 2015, at 7:07 PM, Toru Nishimura > wrote: > > folks, > > PLS forgive me if my trouble is well known and already solved so > far. I'm having 6.1.5/amd64 boot failure with ASM6201 PCIe card > recently bought from eBay. > > I found the similar trouble was once reported to netbsd-us

ASMedia 6201 AHCI boot failure

2015-03-31 Thread Toru Nishimura
folks, PLS forgive me if my trouble is well known and already solved so far. I'm having 6.1.5/amd64 boot failure with ASM6201 PCIe card recently bought from eBay. I found the similar trouble was once reported to netbsd-users@ around 2013-March with "wd0 dos error" subject. /// short summary ///

Re: Request to reconsider removal of groff from base system

2015-03-31 Thread tlaronde
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:24:51PM +0100, Gerard Lally wrote: > > As someone who uses groff as a lightweight alternative to TeX and > friends** FWIW, I have developed a minimal TeX system: kerTeX (http://www.kergis.com/kertex.html) (french; english at http://www.kergis.com/en/kertex.html). A min

Re: Request to reconsider removal of groff from base system

2015-03-31 Thread Gerard Lally
At date and time Tue, 31 Mar 2015 15:18:36 +0200, tlaronde wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:24:51PM +0100, Gerard Lally wrote: > > > > As someone who uses groff as a lightweight alternative to TeX and > > friends** > > FWIW, I have developed a minimal TeX system: kerTeX > (http://www.kergis.com

Re: Request to reconsider removal of groff from base system

2015-03-31 Thread Greg Troxel
Eric Haszlakiewicz writes: > How much space do you expect it to actually actually take up? If all > you want is groff, dont't install pkgsrc itself, just pkg_add the > groff package! It pulls in a lot now, by inspection of the package, including ghostscript. pgpUX0WXb6s2K.pgp Description: PG

Re: Request to reconsider removal of groff from base system

2015-03-31 Thread Eric Haszlakiewicz
On March 31, 2015 7:24:51 AM EDT, Gerard Lally wrote: >While reading the INSTALL notes for amd64 today, I learned that >groff(1) >is to be phased out in a future release, since man pages are handled >with mandoc(1), and groff(1) can still be found in pkgsrc as >textproc/groff. > >As someone who

Re: Request to reconsider removal of groff from base system

2015-03-31 Thread Greg Troxel
Gerard Lally writes: > While reading the INSTALL notes for amd64 today, I learned that groff(1) > is to be phased out in a future release, since man pages are handled > with mandoc(1), and groff(1) can still be found in pkgsrc as textproc/groff. > > As someone who uses groff as a lightweight alt

Request to reconsider removal of groff from base system

2015-03-31 Thread Gerard Lally
While reading the INSTALL notes for amd64 today, I learned that groff(1) is to be phased out in a future release, since man pages are handled with mandoc(1), and groff(1) can still be found in pkgsrc as textproc/groff. As someone who uses groff as a lightweight alternative to TeX and friends**, I