I would like to use clang++ to build some software on NetBSD. I understand
that I can build the entire NetBSD system with clang and have it installed in
the process. (Does that process also install the llvm libc++?) However, I
have an existing system with the native gcc toolchain that I need
In article <557315f5.6030...@gmx.com>, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>On 06.06.2015 14:35, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>> In article <20150606142015.ga61...@nordend.local.sourire.ch>,
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I am quite new to netbsd and I am curious about
>>> the security mechanisms available.
>>>
>>> In
Hi All,
Could you Please indicate me what are the main differences
between the both packets filters NPF and PF?
Until now I use regularly (under OpenBSD) PF to create
firewall. What I appreciate particularly with PF is the "overload"
function and the "authpf" shell.
I have not seen any menti
On 06.06.2015 14:35, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> In article <20150606142015.ga61...@nordend.local.sourire.ch>,
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I am quite new to netbsd and I am curious about
>> the security mechanisms available.
>>
>> In the security page "http://www.netbsd.org/support/security/";,
>> I can se
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015, rhin...@epost.ch wrote:
> In the security page "http://www.netbsd.org/support/security/";,
> I can see that the PaX module is used in the kernel
> but without any other information.
Also see http://netbsd.gw.com/cgi-bin/man-cgi?security+7+NetBSD-current
In article <20150606142015.ga61...@nordend.local.sourire.ch>,
wrote:
>Hi,
> I am quite new to netbsd and I am curious about
>the security mechanisms available.
>
>In the security page "http://www.netbsd.org/support/security/";,
>I can see that the PaX module is used in the kernel
>but without a
Hi,
I am quite new to netbsd and I am curious about
the security mechanisms available.
In the security page "http://www.netbsd.org/support/security/";,
I can see that the PaX module is used in the kernel
but without any other information.
What should be done in order to use (and perhaps config
chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas) wrote:
> The question is what should -p do?
It does output the internally defined macros (like what is defined for e.g.
${CC}) and e.g. suffix rules (like what is defined for .c.o). Of course one
can redefine everything he uses, then these internally defin
