On July 19, 2015 10:46:59 AM EDT, "William A. Mahaffey III"
wrote:
>On 07/19/15 09:40, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
>> need the suse-10, rather than 12, unless suse-12 is backwards
>> compatible w/ suse-10, would you have any info on that ?
Sorry, no idea.
>about putting an entry in my fstab
On 07/19/15 11:32, Robert Swindells wrote:
William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
Update: I went ahead & did a 'pkgin install suse_base-10
suse_compat-10' & it installed those packages no sweat. Post install,
it said something about putting an entry in my fstab file mounting
procfs as /emul/linux/proc.
William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
>Update: I went ahead & did a 'pkgin install suse_base-10
>suse_compat-10' & it installed those packages no sweat. Post install,
>it said something about putting an entry in my fstab file mounting
>procfs as /emul/linux/proc. I already have a procfs in my fstab file
On 07/19/15 09:40, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
On 07/18/15 14:54, Eric Haszlakiewicz wrote:
On July 18, 2015 11:38:06 AM EDT, "William A. Mahaffey III"
wrote:
[wam@4256EE1, ~, 10:32:08am] 240 % file bin/VectorExe.AMD64.new
bin/VectorExe.AMD64.new: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version
On 07/18/15 14:54, Eric Haszlakiewicz wrote:
On July 18, 2015 11:38:06 AM EDT, "William A. Mahaffey III"
wrote:
[wam@4256EE1, ~, 10:32:08am] 240 % file bin/VectorExe.AMD64.new
bin/VectorExe.AMD64.new: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1
(SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), f
