On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 12:13:06PM +0100, Petar Bogdanovic wrote:
>
> I also tried a 5-stream dd test, based on one of your previous mails:
>
> https://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-users/2014/12/01/msg015503.html
>
> All five streams got ~10MB/s each (bs=16k), more or less consistent with
>
On Thu, 3 Dec 2015, Petar Bogdanovic wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 08:23:28PM +, Michael van Elst wrote:
That's probably why setting the queues all to fcfs is the best
for you.
Not as dramatic as Emile's numbers but significantly higher read
throughput:
Am I missing something here? You
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 10:33:15AM +, Stephen Borrill wrote:
>
> Am I missing something here? Your figures suggest that Input (i.e. reading)
> is pretty much the same, but it is Output (i.e. writing) that has higher
> throughput
You're right, I mixed it up. Write throughput is what I meant.
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 07:51:28PM -0500, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
>
> What strategy are you using to sort inside RAIDframe? This is a property
> of the RAID set; you can see it with raidctl I believe for autoconfigured
> sets.
>
> I wouldn't be terribly surprised to see bad interactions betwe
