On Sat, Jun 01, 2019 at 12:09:34PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 01, 2019 at 08:59:45AM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
>
> I wish bozohttpd supported .htpasswd for cgi scripts!
>
> I just checked, that it doesn't.
It does, but not for /cgi-bin/ ones.
I run a service that I implemented in a perl
On Sat, Jun 01, 2019 at 08:59:45AM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
I wish bozohttpd supported .htpasswd for cgi scripts!
I just checked, that it doesn't.
I could have wrapped static contents under a cgi script to meet the auth
requirement for all contents with one .htpasswd file.
Mayuresh
> On May 31, 2019, at 10:01 PM, Mayuresh wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 07:52:25PM +, Christopher Pinon wrote:
>>> I meant, if we can't solve this in bozohttpd, please suggest some other
>>> httpd which is nearest match to its minimalistic approach.
>>
>> apache? ;-)
>
> Well... minim
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 10:45:08PM -0400, Matt Sporleder wrote:
>Apache runs in well under 1MB and does all of this stuff and more.
>I wrote the original version of this if the default config freaks you out
>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HTTPD/Minimal+Config
>Don’t use
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 07:52:25PM +, Christopher Pinon wrote:
> > I meant, if we can't solve this in bozohttpd, please suggest some other
> > httpd which is nearest match to its minimalistic approach.
>
> apache? ;-)
Well... minimalistic?
Any takers for lighttpd, it it light as its name sug
Greg Troxel wrote:
> > Adding GPT support to primary bootstrap (bootxx) seems straightforward,
> > but I still wonder about secondary boostrap (boot).
>
> Sure, but it seems clear that either there is a way to pass in the start
> offset, or it has logic to parse partition tables and skip raid
>
m...@netbsd.org (Emmanuel Dreyfus) writes:
> Greg Troxel wrote:
>
>> Right, but this is just code that isn't written, and it seems like it
>> could not be that hard.
>
> Adding GPT support to primary bootstrap (bootxx) seems straightforward,
> but I still wonder about secondary boostrap (boot).
Mayuresh wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 11:18:40PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> > Has anyone come across this situation and how do you deal with it. I like
> > bozohttpd's minimalistic approach and would switch away from it only as a
> > last resort.
>
> I meant, if we can't solve this in bozohttp
Greg Troxel wrote:
> Right, but this is just code that isn't written, and it seems like it
> could not be that hard.
Adding GPT support to primary bootstrap (bootxx) seems straightforward,
but I still wonder about secondary boostrap (boot).
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
m...@n
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 11:18:40PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> Has anyone come across this situation and how do you deal with it. I like
> bozohttpd's minimalistic approach and would switch away from it only as a
> last resort.
I meant, if we can't solve this in bozohttpd, please suggest some other
h
man httpd makes it clear that the .htpasswd authentication does not apply
to subdirectories.
.htpasswd exists in the directory of the current request, bozohttpd will
restrict access to documents in that directory using the RFC 2617 HTTP
“Basic” authentication scheme.
Note: Thi
m...@netbsd.org (Emmanuel Dreyfus) writes:
> Robert Elz wrote:
>
>> If you don't know already, it doesn't
>
> Right, then I am back to the original problem: we currently have no way
> to boot off a RAID 1 that has a filesystem larger than 2 TB *if the disk
> does not features 4kB blocks*.
>
> F
Date:Sat, 1 Jun 2019 02:52:41 +1000
From:Nathanial Sloss
Message-ID: <201906010252.42361@netbsd.org>
| I would create a small gpt wedge on the disc an put on it
| /boot /boot.cfg and the kernel
If you need them, you might want the kernel modules there as well
Hi,
I haven't been following the thread closely so please disregard if this has
already been suggested.
I setup all of my machines to raid-1 with pairs of 6tb drives last year.
I unfortunately have to boot from usb thumbdrive due to being unable to boot
from a gpt wedege with in a raid 1 gpt w
Robert Elz wrote:
> If you don't know already, it doesn't
Right, then I am back to the original problem: we currently have no way
to boot off a RAID 1 that has a filesystem larger than 2 TB *if the disk
does not features 4kB blocks*.
Filesystem larger than 2 TB requires a GPT, and bootloaders
31.05.2019 18:39, U'll Be King of the Stars пишет:
Well, you could, but I doubt that would work - it isn't wise to lie
to the system... But it works with drives that really have 4K sectors.
Sorry, I do not get it: how can I know if the disk has 4k sectors, andd
if it does, how can I rework th
On 31/05/2019 16:00, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> Robert Elz wrote:
>
>> Well, you could, but I doubt that would work - it isn't wise to lie
>> to the system... But it works with drives that really have 4K sectors.
>
> Sorry, I do not get it: how can I know if the disk has 4k sectors, andd
> if i
Date:Fri, 31 May 2019 17:00:13 +0200
From:m...@netbsd.org (Emmanuel Dreyfus)
Message-ID: <1o8g9t3.1xh6erjzo45lum%m...@netbsd.org>
| Sorry, I do not get it: how can I know if the disk has 4k sectors,
It will tell you when asked - which the kernel does when it attache
Hi, I have a rather slow Intel Atom CPU, so when running NFS copy over
1GbE, one CPU is quite busy servicing interrupts. So with NetBSD-8
there is intrctl command:
# intrctl list
interrupt id CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3 device name(s)
ioapic0 pin 90*0 0 0 acpi SCI
ioapic0 pin
Robert Elz wrote:
> Well, you could, but I doubt that would work - it isn't wise to lie
> to the system... But it works with drives that really have 4K sectors.
Sorry, I do not get it: how can I know if the disk has 4k sectors, andd
if it does, how can I rework the disklabel so that it can des
I have no deep knowledge of NetBSD code, but I use
lot of servers in production with LSI 1064 and 1068.
I think mpt driver lack real support for RAID management
on these chips, Unknown async events are proving that.
I may be wrong but I have no cases where RAID was
managed through bio and mpt.
31
Hello, all,
I'm trying to figure out how to create a mirrored set of disks using
bioctl with an mpt controller:
mpt0 at pci11 dev 1 function 0: Symbios Logic SAS1064 (rev. 0x02)
mpt0: interrupting at ivec 1f8f
mpt0: Phy 0: Link Status Unknown
mpt0: Phy 0: Link Status Unknown
mpt0: Phy 0: Link
Date:Fri, 31 May 2019 12:02:21 +0200
From:m...@netbsd.org (Emmanuel Dreyfus)
Message-ID: <1o8fw11.vifpmjr39i79m%m...@netbsd.org>
| You mean I edit the disklabel, change bytes/sector from 512 to 4096, and
| recompute everything with the new block size?
Well, you co
m...@netbsd.org (Emmanuel Dreyfus) writes:
>You mean I edit the disklabel, change bytes/sector from 512 to 4096, and
>recompute everything with the new block size?
>Will that work with an existing filesystem (without the need to run
>newfs again)?
The disklabel is supposed to give you informatio
Robert Elz wrote:
> I suspect that what you're thinking of is when some other partitioning
> scheme is used - both MBR and disklabel are limited to 32 bit block
> counts and offsets.(GPT isn't).Nb: block counts: if you have a
> 4KB block size device, then you can get (2^32 -1 ) * 4K bytes
Martin Husemann wrote:
> You can use the raw disk partition as only partition
Well, resize_ffs will not cope with that. Even with the -s flag, it
fails to act on a big (> 2 TB) raid0d.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
m...@netbsd.org
26 matches
Mail list logo
