On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:11:21AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> Perhaps, but that's solving a problem we are trying to get rid of, which
> is needing different builds for each hardware flavor.
jared's images are applying a different u-boot/vendor firmware to each
image, the netbsd side of things is
Greg Troxel wrote:
> > 3. I went back and clicked on "arm" in the CPU column, bringing me to:
> > http://wiki.netbsd.org/ports/evbarm/
> >
> > Some good background upfront but under the Raspberry Pi header
> > there's only a line saying what models are supported.
>
> Sort of near the
"Sijmen J. Mulder" writes:
> Greg Troxel wrote:
>> > 3. I went back and clicked on "arm" in the CPU column, bringing me to:
>> > http://wiki.netbsd.org/ports/evbarm/
>> >
>> > Some good background upfront but under the Raspberry Pi header
>> > there's only a line saying what models
tlaro...@polynum.com writes:
>> There's also FreeBSD's HAST:
>> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/disks-hast.html
>This is quite interesting! And I'm happy to see that what I was
>searching for was not totally stupid. It is a kind of "remote" RAID1
>with dissymmetry and fallback so it's approa
"Sijmen J. Mulder" writes:
> It seems quite hard to find a Raspberry Pi image on the site:
>
> 1. On http://www.netbsd.org/ I clicked "ARMv7" next to the arm entry
> which mentions the Pi.
>
> 2. This brings me here:
> http://cdn.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/NetBSD-8.1/evbarm-earmv7hf/
This
Hi,
It seems quite hard to find a Raspberry Pi image on the site:
1. On http://www.netbsd.org/ I clicked "ARMv7" next to the arm entry
which mentions the Pi.
2. This brings me here:
http://cdn.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/NetBSD-8.1/evbarm-earmv7hf/
There's an extensive HTML document wh
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 07:55:03AM +0930, Brett Lymn wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 10:38:17AM +0200, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
> >
> > I have read the presentation of the features (I have a copy of a book on
> > AFS that I need to read to), so it has features that I'm after but it
> > lacks a
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 09:26:49AM +0100, Stephen Borrill wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2019, Brett Lymn wrote:
> >>I have in mind a simple block upon which one could imagine building
> >>distributed data.
> >>
> >
> >Have you looked at glusterfs? It sounds like you may be trying to
> >implement somethi
On Wed, 26 Jun 2019, Brett Lymn wrote:
I have in mind a simple block upon which one could imagine building
distributed data.
Have you looked at glusterfs? It sounds like you may be trying to
implement something like that.
There's also FreeBSD's HAST:
https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/dis
