Working with a VM. Added 1 CPU and 3GB memory to the instance, 4 GB RAM
total
Added a 50GB disk, presents as wd2
Commands (edited to show kinda relevant ones) I also have a full backup of
my home dir in case I fat fingered anything
9986 19:24dmesg
9987 19:24sudo zpool create z
Jörn Clausen writes:
> Now I want to add an unprivileged installation, that I want to
> distribute via NFS (hence the question regarding symlinks the other
> day, as they appear when using amd). The source directory is
>
> /vol/pkgsrc/20190803/pkgsrc
>
> and I bootstrap with
>
> $ ./bootstrap
Hi!
I am using pkgsrc on several NetBSD machines the "native way", i.e.
compiling in /usr/pkgsrc, installing to /usr/pkg and configuration in
/etc/mk.conf.
Now I want to add an unprivileged installation, that I want to
distribute via NFS (hence the question regarding symlinks the other
day, as
How did you move your home directory? Did you create /tank/home then symlink
the /home -> /tank/home?
From: Alistair Crooks
Date: Thursday, August 8, 2019 at 11:53 AM
To: Ronald Georgia
Cc: Marc Baudoin , NetBSD Users
Subject: Re: State of ZFS in 9.0_BETA
On Thu, 8 Aug 2019
On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 07:52, Ronald Georgia wrote:
> Same here. I have two 9BETA machines using zfs. Both have a mirrored pool
> of two disks. So far things seem to be working. This weekend I will be
> testing snapshots and send/receive.
>
> BTW, nice job with zfs.
>
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at
>Same here. I have two 9BETA machines using zfs. Both have a mirrored pool of
>two disks. So far things seem to be working. This weekend I will be testing
>snapshots and send/receive.
>BTW, nice job with zfs.
>>On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 10:47 AM Marc Baudoin
>> wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>ZFS has been
Same here. I have two 9BETA machines using zfs. Both have a mirrored pool
of two disks. So far things seem to be working. This weekend I will be
testing snapshots and send/receive.
BTW, nice job with zfs.
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 10:47 AM Marc Baudoin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ZFS has been updated for
Hi,
ZFS has been updated for 9.0_BETA. I've tried it and it seems
usable (I couldn't make it work in 8.0 so it's a real progress).
Now I'd like to know what's its state in 9.0_BETA (still
experimental, quite stable, production ready --- might be too
early) and what's the goal for the future?
In article ,
Brad Spencer wrote:
>
>I compiled up 9.0_BETA and upgraded a 8.x DOMU. I found that 9.0_BETA
>suffers from the bug I wrote about in lib/53675. Basically, ldaps won't
>work. In particular, it appears that the client code is broken as
>ldapsearch will refuse to work against an
