On 06.03.2020 19:42, Maxime Villard wrote:
> Having said that, indeed KVM will architecturally perform fewer syscalls,
> because it emulates certain devices in kernel mode -- which can increase
> performance because it avoids a kernel<->userland cycle, but can decrease
> security (see bug class abo
On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 at 22:04, Ottavio Caruso
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 at 08:19, Ottavio Caruso
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 at 07:28, Andreas Gustafsson wrote:
> > >
> > > Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> > > > I can see all the boot messages and I can log in through the serial
> > > > console
I'm not subscribed to this list, but I saw this thread while searching for
an unrelated thing, so here are a few remarks:
> On 06.03.2020 12:35, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> > A hypervisor backend shall implement instruction decoder for MMIO/PIO
> > operations. NVMM performs this emulation in userspa
Staffan Thomén writes:
> Greg Troxel wrote:
>> The other thing you can do is export the zvol snapshot via iscsi and use
>> an iscsi initiator on netbsd to mount it.
>
> I tried this particular flavor of filesystem/network pretzel and when
> a full backup ran, it worked for a while and then killed
On 06.03.2020 12:35, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> A hypervisor backend shall implement instruction decoder for MMIO/PIO
> operations. NVMM performs this emulation in userspace, while others like
> HAXM perform this inside the kernel.
>
> There are pros and cons but it is a distinct property of NVMM,
On 06.03.2020 10:22, Ilia Zykov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this page - https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/from_zero_to_nvmm says:
>
> “One thing you may have noticed from Fig. A, is that the complex emulation
> machinery is not in the kernel, but in USERLAND. This is an excellent
> security property of
Hello,
this page - https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/from_zero_to_nvmm says:
“One thing you may have noticed from Fig. A, is that the complex emulation
machinery is not in the kernel, but in USERLAND. This is an excellent security
property of NVMM, because it reduces the risk for the host in ca
OK, well that is the answer, I did not get it earlier. Thank you very much!
Best regards
Petr
On 06. 03. 20 9:14, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 09:09:47AM +0100, Petr Topiarz wrote:
Yes, I use altq, but how to use it in NPF?
AFAIK you can't. But you don't need NPF or PF to use
Yes, I use altq, but how to use it in NPF?
Dne 06. 03. 20 v 8:56 Manuel Bouyer napsal(a):
On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 09:35:35PM +0100, Petr Topiarz wrote:
Hi folks,
I run several routers with 8.1 and pf and I need traffic shaping.
If I understand correctly, there is no pf in NetBSD 9.0. But ther
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 09:09:47AM +0100, Petr Topiarz wrote:
> Yes, I use altq, but how to use it in NPF?
AFAIK you can't. But you don't need NPF or PF to use altq; it has its own
packet classifier: altqd, configured with altq.conf
--
Manuel Bouyer
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront touj
10 matches
Mail list logo
