Silas wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> >iconv -f UTF-8 -t ASCII//TRANSLIT fileout
>
> It seems it is not possible on NetBSD 9.0 iconv :-(
It looks like //TRANSLIT is a GNU glibc extension not available in
NetBSD's version of libc. Sorry.
> $ echo 'pão' | iconv -f UTF-8
Todd Gruhn wrote:
> I extracted the "text" from a large PDF using a NetBSD prog called
> pdftotext(1).
pdftotext is really awesome. I find "pdftotext -layout" to do a truly
excellent job with most PDF files I need to deal with from banks and
things here.
> I got the desired ASCII text, but it
Bartek Krawczyk wrote:
> Oh I should have been more clear from the start. This is for rc.d script for
> wip/adguardhome. Probably during startup it doesn't really matter,
I believe you are correct. During boot time all processes start from
the init daemon and will not be attached to a
Bartek Krawczyk wrote:
> is there any program in base which allows to daemonize programs which don't
> detach from console, don't have any "-daemon" option etc.? There are
> sysutils/daemond and sysutils/daemonize in pkgsrc of course but do we have
> anything like "daemon" in FreeBSD base?
>
> As
Mayuresh wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 03:19:22PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > So for example it is okay for a mailing list for a domain like
> > us...@lists.example.com be hosted on a machine server123.example.net
> > at a different hostname and FQDN. That'
Jason Mitchell wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Then Thunderbird will *send* mail using again many possible protocols
> > but perhaps most typically using an authenticated SMTP to the
> > submission port 587 on the configured mail server. Postfix is my
> > preference
Jason Mitchell wrote:
> Everything you have written is totally accurate, but self signed
> certificates for SMTP may be going away.
>
> The latest version of Thunderbird requires a valid certificate on
> the SMTP server it uses.
>
> (Sorry for the formatting, I can't send mail from my laptop until
Mayuresh wrote:
> I get 2 public ips from the cloud provider - one is ipv4 and one ipv6.
...
> Is this feasible?
But it's all "dual stack networking" these days. Those two software
stacks, IPv4 and IPv6, are operated in parallel. I strongly recommend
not to try to go with one logical virtual
Mayuresh wrote:
> My main requirement from one of the domains is a mailing list. As long as
> it merely relays the mails without touching the mail headers / body, can I
> get away without implementing all these measures? I have done so once, but
> not sure whether it survived based on reputation
Brett Lymn wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > SPF identifies authorized IP addresses for domains in the message
> > envelope. Therefore the reverse DNS pointer record does not matter in
>
> I used to be postmaster for a large organisation and know for a fact that
> even if
Mayuresh wrote:
> I am faced with a requirement to merge the mail servers running on 2 VPSes
> into 1, with a single ip address on NetBSD 9.1 amd64.
Generally this should not be a problem for a single server to handle
email for multiple domains. Assuming that one FQDN is chosen to be
the exit
Mayuresh wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 01, 2021 at 09:53:13AM -0600, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
> > If you set up spf, dkim, and dns correctly you shouldn't have any issues.
>
> How exactly - meaning if these are set reverse dns check is not applied by
> peers or does it mean these mechanisms deal with
Greg Troxel wrote:
> At:
>
> http://wiki.netbsd.org/community/
>
> mailinglists are the first thing. But they didn't have an obvious
> header, so I can see how they would be missed.
Looking at that page now I find that the netbsd-announce link is
missing a path part in the href url.
13 matches
Mail list logo
