h dead pthreads and
the mapped stacks are the memory leak observed.
--
J. Hannken-Illjes - hann...@mailbox.org
p2.c
Description: Binary data
001_pthread_revert.diff
Description: Binary data
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
t; ### START
>
> Tue Mar 15 10:16:49 GMT 2022
> Starting root file system check:
> Can't open /dev/rld0a: Device not configured
Take a look at /sbin/scan_ffs aka. /rescue/scan_ffs.
--
J. Hannken-Illjes - hann...@mailbox.org
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
et/dist/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_acl.c:1664 f.
>
> -- we don't: Should I send-pr?
Looks like the attached diff is sufficient.
Will you commit or should I?
--
J. Hannken-Illjes - hann...@mailbox.org
zfs_acl.c.diff
Description: Binary data
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
> On 5. Dec 2021, at 22:07, Greg A. Woods wrote:
>
> At Sun, 5 Dec 2021 10:38:54 +0100, "J. Hannken-Illjes"
> wrote:
> Subject: Re: mount_union(8) vs. open(O_RDWR)
>>
>> There are (up to) three vnodes involved:
>>
>> - The union vnode at
> On 5. Dec 2021, at 08:52, Greg A. Woods wrote:
>
> At Sat, 4 Dec 2021 10:25:27 +0100, "J. Hannken-Illjes"
> wrote:
> Subject: Re: mount_union(8) vs. open(O_RDWR)
>>
>> Ok some comments:
>>
>> - union_copyup() works and is needed fo
64] union_newsize: utmpx: upper size now 0
> [ 4.3602577] union_newsize: utmpx: upper size now 520
> [ 4.3602577] union_newsize: utmpx: upper size now 1040
> [ 4.3602577] union_newsize: utmpx: upper size now 1560
> [ 4.3742532] union_newsize: utmpx: upper size now 2080
> init: kernel security level changed from 0 to 1
> [ 4.4112513] union_newsize: utmpx: upper size now 2600
>
>
> --
> Greg A. Woods
>
> Kelowna, BC +1 250 762-7675 RoboHack
> Planix, Inc. Avoncote Farms
Ok some comments:
- union_copyup() works and is needed for regular nodes only.
- it copies the node attributes up so checking the access on
the (copied) upper node should be sufficient.
- the switch() on top checks for read-only mounted upper layer,
not the lower layer.
The attached diff just copies up in the VWRITE/VREG case and
this should be sufficient -- please give it a try.
--
J. Hannken-Illjes - hann...@mailbox.org
002_union_access.diff
Description: Binary data
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
ys/fs/union/union_vnops.c::union_access():
/*
* Check access permission on the union vnode.
* The access check being enforced is to check
* against both the underlying vnode, and any
* copied vnode. This ensures that no additional
* file permissions are given away simply because
* the user caused an implicit file copy.
*/
int
union_access(void *v)
As the underlying node is on a ro-mounted file system this will
always fail with EROFS if the underlying node exists.
Maybe we should check for read access on the underlying file system,
copy up and then check the upper node.
--
J. Hannken-Illjes - hann...@mailbox.org
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
s.
>
> Same on -current from 15 minutes ago, but I guess it was expected.
Please try again with Rev. 1.57 of
src/external/cddl/osnet/dist/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_vnops.c
--
J. Hannken-Illjes - hann...@eis.cs.tu-bs.de - TU Braunschweig
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
UTC 2019
> mkre...@mkrepro.netbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC amd64
While "zfs status" is wrong as there is no command "status"
the ZFS module should be loaded automatically and you should
get a usage from running this command.
You have "/dev/zfs"
> On 23. Jun 2018, at 10:44, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 01:35:59AM -0400, Dan LaBell wrote:
>> Did Netbsd, ever support force remount readonly for root?
>
> I'm not sure it's fully supported.
On NetBSD-8 "mount -f -r -u /" shoul
come a quirk. Could you try an unmodified
kernel with option PCMCIAVERBOSE and post the dmesg?
--
J. Hannken-Illjes - hann...@eis.cs.tu-bs.de - TU Braunschweig (Germany)
> On 9. Jul 2017, at 12:09, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
>
> J. Hannken-Illjes a écrit :
>> Is the /usr file system UFS1 or UFS2, output of dumpfs could help.
>
> FFSv2 with log (and async flag).
Ok, UFS2 with dynamic inode initialisation. Did your machine ever
crash since
e 0x2f20 (chr, sticky, suid, sgid, mode rr-), looks like garbage.
I suppose fsck will not complain about unallocated garbage inodes.
Is the /usr file system UFS1 or UFS2, output of dumpfs could help.
--
J. Hannken-Illjes - hann...@eis.cs.tu-bs.de - TU Braunschweig (Germany)
gives:
fd23:6e0f:e899:a7b4::/64 if=cas0
flags=LO vltime=2592000, pltime=604800, expired, ref=1
No advertising router
but here the prefix route fd23:6e0f:e899:a7b4::/64 exists.
File /etc/rc.conf has "dhcpcd=YES", no network config, no "ip6mode".
Dhcpcd is "6.7.1".
A
> On 20 Jun 2016, at 06:04, Brett Lymn wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 10:51:44AM +0200, J. Hannken-Illjes wrote:
>>
>> This assertion is from 2015/03/27, last change to coda was 2015/09/06.
>>
>
> What can I say? $REALLIFE has been interferi
ly never locks vnodes before it calls vnode
operations using c_ovp. This is a bug.
--
J. Hannken-Illjes - hann...@eis.cs.tu-bs.de - TU Braunschweig (Germany)
hen it seems to be unmapped?
sys_mmap() found in sys/uvm/uvm_mmap.c tests FIXED maps for (values for
amd64 in parentheses) for
addr >= VM_MIN_ADDRESS (0)
and
addr+size <= VM_MAXUSER_ADDRESS (0x7f80)
You try a value above VM_MAXUSER_ADDRESS:
0x00040000 &g
CPU mode to see if it helps
> - Switching file systems
> - Trying different versions of netbsd (6.1.5?)
>
> Suggestions? I suspect I need something that maintains binary compatibility
> with the 6 series.
If the system has tmpfs (tmpfs /tmp tmpfs rw) this could be ticket #1365
(http://releng.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/req-6.cgi?show=1365).
--
J. Hannken-Illjes - hann...@eis.cs.tu-bs.de - TU Braunschweig (Germany)
directories here.
Please post full dmesg.
--
J. Hannken-Illjes - hann...@eis.cs.tu-bs.de - TU Braunschweig (Germany)
protocol)
> esiop_intr: I shouldn't be there !
This is esiop: Enhanced Symbios Logic/NCR 53c8xx SCSI driver.
How did you configure the disk(s) on the kvm host, driver/bus?
--
J. Hannken-Illjes - hann...@eis.cs.tu-bs.de - TU Braunschweig (Germany)
>
> 2086 1 3 14 100 a0003eca46a0 qmgr nfsrcv
> 677 1 3 5 0 a0003dd6fa40syslogd nfsrcv
> 0 131 3 3 200 a0003d75d140 nfskqpoll nfsrcv
Looks like a NFS problem, too many threads in nfsrcv...
On 19 Feb 2015, at 12:41, Hauke Fath wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 12:15:33 +0100, J. Hannken-Illjes wrote:
>> I use this entry in boot.cfg:
>>
>> menu=Boot alternate:multiboot netbsd console=com console_speed=57600
>> root=raid0h
>
> Hm - would this load th
oot netbsd -a", and then select raid0g, but this
> requires manual intervention. How can I permanently specify the
> selection in boot.cfg(5)?
--
J. Hannken-Illjes - hann...@eis.cs.tu-bs.de - TU Braunschweig (Germany)
2884736
> sectors
> sd0: fabricating a geometry
> sd0: mbr partition exceeds disk size
I would call this an error message.
> sd0: GPT GUID: c4b3e41f-d14b-11e3-950f-00259084a564
> dk0 at sd0: c4b3e43c-d14b-11e3-950f-00259084a564
> sd0: tagged queueing
>
> Derrick Lobo
--
J. Hannken-Illjes - hann...@eis.cs.tu-bs.de - TU Braunschweig (Germany)
On Feb 25, 2013, at 4:20 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
> Check src/doc/CHANGES-5.2 in the head of netbsd-5. I believe there was
> a pullup that addressed this. Or at least to netbsd-6.
NetBSD-5.1.2 is missing the attached diff. 5.2 and on should have it.
--
J. Hannken-Illjes - hann...@eis
25 matches
Mail list logo
