Re: RaidFrame errors

2013-06-03 Thread William Ross
On 3 June 2013 16:35, Greg Oster wrote: > raid0 is a RAID 1 set, yes? Thats right. >> At that point the / raid1 was running on wd0 and wd1 and had the > > By this you mean a RAID 1 set for / ? Yes, the device /dev/raid0 which is a RAID 1 set and is mounted on /. > If I had to guess, I'd bet th

RaidFrame errors

2013-06-02 Thread William Ross
I have a NetBSD box running 6.0.1 i386. It has four 3TB HDs with two raidframe raid arrays configured. The first raid array is a raid0 for / (currently over wd0 and wd3, using 5GB on each disk), the second a raid5 for a data partition (over wd0, wd1, wd2, wd3 using all remaing space (reporting 8TB