> I still see it on an 11.0 BETA from Aug. 27 on hppa:
>
> [vom@c3700 ~]$ uname -a
> NetBSD c3700.retronet.burn.net 11.0_BETA NetBSD 11.0_BETA (GENERIC) #0: Wed
> Aug 27 12:56:40 UTC 2025
> mkre...@mkrepro.netbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/hppa/compile/GENERIC
> hppa
> [
> vom@c3700 ~]$ dig arin.net soa
> assertion "!(urcu_memb_reader).registered" failed: file
> "/usr/src/external/lgpl2/userspace-rcu/lib/liburcu-memb/../../dist/src/urcu.c",
> line 486, function "urcu_memb_register_thread"
is this still a problem? i switched us to using liburcu-mb which
avoided similar issues for me on arm64 a
"Jonathan A. Kollasch" writes:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 05:51:32PM +0200, Paolo Pisati wrote:
> > I'm slimming down a GENERIC i386 kernel[1] for an embedded board[2], when i
> > discovered that turning off MULTIPROCESSOR, leads to:
>
> There's a reason it's in std.i386 and std.amd64 and not GENERI
i wonder if this is lack of buf_destroy() in rf_FreeDiskQueueData(),
to match the buf_init() in rf_CreateDiskQueueData().
can you try this patch?
.mrg.
Index: rf_diskqueue.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/src/sys/dev/raidframe/rf_diskqueu
> Since upgrading to 9.99.81, httpd doesn't launch a cgi that has
> worked for years, to wit /var/www/cgi-bin/ikiwiki.cgi.
>
> My rc.conf looks at it always has, at least in regard to httpd:
>
> httpd=YES httpd_flags="-I "
>httpd_wwwdir="/var/www"
>
are there any logs or anythin
glad you got it working.
FWIW, in general, modern Xorg server runs with no xorg.conf fine
in almost all cases. the only reasons i use one are to choose
specific options at start up time that aren't easily available,
but the vast majority of the sections aren't needed.
eg, to get a core dump vs
> I've confirmed with upstream that this library is just obsolete. The
> code to support it in the X server was removed 12 years ago.
>
> I've removed lbxproxy and proxymngr from pkgsrc.
last i saw, pkgsrc was still had the Xprint components,
which have been obsolete a similar or even longer time
Swift Griggs writes:
>
> I like NetBSD's httpd. I noticed a couple of minor inconsistencies in the
> bozohttpd(8) manual page. Where should I report these?
thanks. directly to me is fine, and is send-pr from netbsd or from
the send-pr form on gnats.netbsd.org.
> * The -v option appears twice i