On Wed, 6 Apr 2022, John D. Baker wrote:
Thereafter, the sample document does show a "check mark" glyph in the
check box fields, but it is rather small.
Looks like evince is using character glyphs to render these text elements
instead of drawing them itself. evince on Linux show the same beha
On Wed, 6 Apr 2022, John D. Baker wrote:
Since the two "No Name" fonts in the example document get substituted
with "Bitstream Vera Sans" and one of those fonts claims have an encoding
of "ZapfDingbats", it would seem that 'fontconfig' is substituting the
wrong font, although I don't know what t
On Wed 06 Apr 2022 at 08:03:55 -0500, John D. Baker wrote:
> Assuming the glyph is "ZaDb 1117 0 R", I don't know how to interpret
> that. Is that character code decimal, hexadecimal, octal?
The number is decimal, but "1117 0 R" is a reference to node number 1117
of the object tree. Think of the R
On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 06:50:46PM -0500, John D. Baker wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Apr 2022, Thomas Klausner wrote:
>
> > Please give wip/evince a try - it contains the latest 42.1 release.
>
> Same behavior. "Checkbox" items show a thin-outline box instead of a
> check mark or other appropriate glyph.
On Tue, 5 Apr 2022, John D. Baker wrote:
Same behavior. "Checkbox" items show a thin-outline box instead of a
check mark or other appropriate glyph.
Does: `xfd -fn/-fa font_name' display the correct (or any) glyph at the
symbol code-point?
-RVP
On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 12:43:04PM -0500, John D. Baker wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Apr 2022, Thomas Klausner wrote:
>
> > I think you might find more evince expertise if you talk to evince
> > upstream about this.
>
> There are a number of open bugs with "checkbox" issues. The following
> most closely d
On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 09:27:17AM -0500, John D. Baker wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Apr 2022, John D. Baker wrote:
>
> > I also have a report that 'mupdf-gl' operates correctly. I will be
> > trying it once my pkg build host finishes its current task. From what
> > I can see, it doesn't cause any additio
On Mon, 4 Apr 2022 at 16:01, John D. Baker wrote:
>
> I routinely use 'evince' when I need to manipulate PDFs with fillable
> fields. When I first started using it, it seemed the "check-mark"
> glyph was missing and the result was a thin-outline box inside the
> area the check-mark should appear.
