Re: Any way to "passive commit" to RAM without syncing ?

2016-03-08 Thread Hal Murray
swiftgri...@gmail.com said: > Let's say I've got a machine with a boatload of RAM and I have an > application which wants extremely fast writes, but doesn't really care that > much about data integrity, and this case, nor do I. Having the system come > back in the same state after rebooting is

Re: Any way to "passive commit" to RAM without syncing ?

2016-03-08 Thread Robert Elz
Sounds like you want a tmpfs, possibly union mounted over the "stable" filesystem, with "rsync" being your :sync" command. kre

Re: Any way to "passive commit" to RAM without syncing ?

2016-03-08 Thread Malcolm Herbert
Sounds like you're looking for a combo of overlay mounts on top of tmpfs - the flush to disk you'd have to manage manually but I've done this with some success in the past and I do seem to recall it being discussed to provide pseudo read-write over a read-only medium such as a CDROM

Any way to "passive commit" to RAM without syncing ?

2016-03-08 Thread Swift Griggs
I know NetBSD supports RAM disks. I also know it uses them for installation, but I'm not sure if they are overlays on top of the static disk images or if they get loaded/populated with the image after the system boots. The effect is the same, either way. You end up with a writable file