Greg A. Woods wrote in
:
|At Tue, 23 Apr 2024 01:41:11 +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso \
|wrote:
|Subject: Re: Mail delivery from Postfix to remote IMAP
|>
|> SPF should never have been introduced
|
|I agree _VERY_ much! It still does absolutely nothing to reduce SMTP
|abuse or increase
At Tue, 23 Apr 2024 01:41:11 +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
Subject: Re: Mail delivery from Postfix to remote IMAP
>
> SPF should never have been introduced
I agree _VERY_ much! It still does absolutely nothing to reduce SMTP
abuse or increase trust in any way what
Rhialto writes:
> The trouble with plain forwarding is that my mail server's domain name
> doesn't match the domain name in the From: header, and doesn't match the
> envelope FROM domain, and it doesn't match the SPF policy of the sender
> domain etc etc. Those are things that are checked by
5:08 +0200, Rhialto wrote:
|Subject: Re: Mail delivery from Postfix to remote IMAP
|>
|> and neither can you change the
|> envelope FROM address because bounces (as far as they happen) won't work.
|
|I haven't verified this works right with Postfix, but if you're doing
|forwarding wi
First off let me second what Steffen says!
At Mon, 22 Apr 2024 21:15:08 +0200, Rhialto wrote:
Subject: Re: Mail delivery from Postfix to remote IMAP
>
> and neither can you change the
> envelope FROM address because bounces (as far as they happen) won't work.
I haven't verified this wo
Rhialto wrote in
:
|On Mon 22 Apr 2024 at 11:20:59 -0700, Greg A. Woods wrote:
|> Just keep doing what you're doing. Anything else _is_ more roundabout.
|> Why complicate things? SMTP forwarding is the way to keep it working!
|
|I agree with you in spirit. Plain forwarding is a basic
On Mon 22 Apr 2024 at 11:20:59 -0700, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> Just keep doing what you're doing. Anything else _is_ more roundabout.
> Why complicate things? SMTP forwarding is the way to keep it working!
I agree with you in spirit. Plain forwarding is a basic feature of SMTP.
BUT.
The trouble
At Mon, 22 Apr 2024 19:39:05 +0200, Rhialto wrote:
Subject: Re: Mail delivery from Postfix to remote IMAP
>
> On Mon 22 Apr 2024 at 19:29:13 +0200, Hauke Fath (SPG) wrote:
> > You would have to have a local delivery
> > agent that (working with stored user credentials) al
At Mon, 22 Apr 2024 18:27:05 +0200, Rhialto wrote:
Subject: Mail delivery from Postfix to remote IMAP
>
> I have a local IMAP server running as well, so I could deliver to that
> and then do an IMAP-move, but that seems rather roundabout and requires
> creating some service which
On Mon 22 Apr 2024 at 19:29:13 +0200, Hauke Fath (SPG) wrote:
> On 2024-04-22 18:27, Rhialto wrote:
> > Since mails can be transferred from one IMAP server to another,
>
> ... by an IMAP client, or server?
Client. Even dovecot (which I already use) has something like that
already: dsync(1) or
On 2024-04-22 18:27, Rhialto wrote:
Since mails can be transferred from one IMAP server to another,
... by an IMAP client, or server?
I know
it is possible to inject emails into IMAP mailboxes.
Yes, with a local delivery agent, on behalf of the local MTA. Or from
within an IMAP client -
I am providing family with an email address on my server. So far I deliver
their mail by forwarding it to their ISP, by using a time-honoured standard
forward.
However, thanks to the fantastic invention of DKIM and SPF and that sort
of things, that is breaking more and more.
For now I work
12 matches
Mail list logo
