On 3 June 2013 16:35, Greg Oster wrote:
> raid0 is a RAID 1 set, yes?
Thats right.
>> At that point the / raid1 was running on wd0 and wd1 and had the
>
> By this you mean a RAID 1 set for / ?
Yes, the device /dev/raid0 which is a RAID 1 set and is mounted on /.
> If I had to guess, I'd bet th
On Sun, 2 Jun 2013 17:14:17 +0100
William Ross wrote:
> I have a NetBSD box running 6.0.1 i386. It has four 3TB HDs with two
> raidframe raid arrays configured.
> The first raid array is a raid0 for / (currently over wd0 and wd3,
raid0 is a RAID 1 set, yes?
> using 5GB on each disk), the second
I have a NetBSD box running 6.0.1 i386. It has four 3TB HDs with two
raidframe raid arrays configured.
The first raid array is a raid0 for / (currently over wd0 and wd3, using
5GB on each disk), the second a raid5 for a data partition (over wd0, wd1,
wd2, wd3 using all remaing space (reporting 8TB