Re: UDF and sector size

2013-10-12 Thread tlaronde
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 06:35:50PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote: > On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 05:14:51PM +0200, rudolf wrote: > > I have a bad experience using UDF under NetBSD - PR kern/44751. There > > are also other open PRs about UDF. YMMV. > > In -current, we have managed to integrate UDF into

Re: UDF and sector size

2013-10-12 Thread tlaronde
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 05:14:51PM +0200, rudolf wrote: > tlaro...@polynum.com wrote: > >Has anybody any info/experience about that, and about sharing UDF > >between NetBSD and others? > > I have a bad experience using UDF under NetBSD - PR kern/44751. There > are also other open PRs about UDF. Y

Re: UDF and sector size

2013-10-12 Thread Martin Husemann
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 05:14:51PM +0200, rudolf wrote: > I have a bad experience using UDF under NetBSD - PR kern/44751. There > are also other open PRs about UDF. YMMV. In -current, we have managed to integrate UDF into the filesystem test suite and this uncovered quite a few bugs, which Reinou

Re: UDF and sector size

2013-10-12 Thread rudolf
tlaro...@polynum.com wrote: Has anybody any info/experience about that, and about sharing UDF between NetBSD and others? I have a bad experience using UDF under NetBSD - PR kern/44751. There are also other open PRs about UDF. YMMV. r.

UDF and sector size

2013-10-11 Thread tlaronde
Hello, I use a NetBSD (5.1.2 on amd64) to serve files (via NFS or Samba) and to do backups. I have put a first backup internal to the server (via 2 disks) and I do an external backup via the network. But the appliance used for this "remote" backup has problems and I need to find another way. I w