On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 10:22:35AM +0100, ignat...@cs.uni-bonn.de wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 09:20:07AM +0100, Benny Siegert wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 8, 2023 at 12:16 PM Riccardo Mottola
> > wrote:
> > > I too notice things are slower on NetBSD with Firefox and ArcticFox seems
> > > to do
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 09:20:07AM +0100, Benny Siegert wrote:
> All this to say: if you want faster Firefox, ultimately you need to
> look into making Rust run faster on NetBSD.
I don't buy that. Most of firefox performance is totally unrelated
to compiler efficiency of neither Rust nor the C++
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 09:20:07AM +0100, Benny Siegert wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2023 at 12:16 PM Riccardo Mottola
> wrote:
> > I too notice things are slower on NetBSD with Firefox and ArcticFox seems
> > to do better, so the hint that "threads" and "processes" might be an issue
> > is a hint.
On Sun, Jan 8, 2023 at 12:16 PM Riccardo Mottola
wrote:
> I too notice things are slower on NetBSD with Firefox and ArcticFox seems to
> do better, so the hint that "threads" and "processes" might be an issue is a
> hint.
I think this has something to do with the relative slowness of
On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 05:32:52PM +0100, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
> I inspect the traffic first for example with the developer tools under
> Firefox, when js is only used to verify arguments and put them in
> canonical form before sending them, calling a page with HTTP or HTTPS,
> with GET or
On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 05:32:52PM +0100, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
> Le Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 09:53:32PM +0530, Mayuresh a écrit :
> > On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 04:56:54PM +0100, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
> > > For this, I would use curl(1) (I do use it to automate downloading of
> > > pages
Le Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 09:53:32PM +0530, Mayuresh a écrit :
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 04:56:54PM +0100, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
> > For this, I would use curl(1) (I do use it to automate downloading of
> > pages when there are no capchas).
>
> How I do this is:
>
> 1. For some of the most
On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 04:56:54PM +0100, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
> For this, I would use curl(1) (I do use it to automate downloading of
> pages when there are no capchas).
How I do this is:
1. For some of the most simple scenarios, cookies ok but no js - curl / wget
2. A little more
Le Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 09:19:36AM +0530, Mayuresh a écrit :
>[...]
> Regarding alternatives:
>
> A lot of my browser usage (reading news, common web searches) is in
> elinks. But I also use firefox' marionette interface heavily to automate
> 100s of repetitive tasks. Have written many scripts
Hi,
On 1/7/23 18:49, Clay Daniels wrote:
I find that firefox 105 or 107 are almost unusable on a laptop running
NetBSD 10.0 BETA.
My older 2014 machine has similar 4gb ram & I have found arcticfox
works best there.
but at the end ArcticFox is really close to Firefox, something like a
mix
On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 08:17:58AM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> Direct rendering of X11 does not work either.
PS: *for me* that is.
From: Mayuresh
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2023 13:17:56 +0530
> Can the difference have something to do with drm not working
> properly on NetBSD.
Had a look here.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DRM
Direct Rendering Manager is the more likely meaning in this discussion.
(Sometimes an acronym can
On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 09:03:59AM +0100, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
> (4Gb is considered huge by old men like me, but, nowadays, I even expect
> to see one day the BIOS/UEFI to refuse to start in such a "contrived"
> environement).
Resource availability growth is an exciting journey because it
On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 09:56:44AM -0800, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> drm = digital rights management?
Ah! Incidentally both drms hurt on NetBSD.
Digital rights management still seems absent.
Direct rendering of X11 does not work either. I meant this one in this
thread.
--
Mayuresh
From: Mayuresh
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2023 13:17:56 +0530
> ... drm not working properly on NetBSD.
drm = digital rights management?
Thx, ... P.
-
mobile: +1 778 951 5147
VoIP: +1 604 670 0140
https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/User:PeterEasthope
On 1/7/2023 1:47 AM, Mayuresh wrote:
I find that firefox 105 or 107 are almost unusable on a laptop running
NetBSD 10.0 BETA.
My older 2014 machine has similar 4gb ram & I have found arcticfox works
best there.
From: Mayuresh
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2023 13:17:56 +0530
> On the other hand, wonder why firefox has to start so many processes
> and occupy so much of RAM in the first place.
Exactly. Dillo opens a simple HTML page in a few ms. FIrefox requires
time on the order of 100 or 1000 more.
Not
Le Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 01:17:56PM +0530, Mayuresh a écrit :
> I find that firefox 105 or 107 are almost unusable on a laptop running
> NetBSD 10.0 BETA.
>
> Following is a top snapshot:
>
> 1615 guest 850 3223M 414M poll/0 0:47 58.46% 54.35% firefox
> 2344 guest 850
I find that firefox 105 or 107 are almost unusable on a laptop running
NetBSD 10.0 BETA.
Following is a top snapshot:
1615 guest 850 3223M 414M poll/0 0:47 58.46% 54.35% firefox
2344 guest 850 2556M 130M poll/3 0:01 0.00% 0.00% firefox
4005 guest 850
19 matches
Mail list logo
