well, now I'm confused...
2 People, two opinions
Here's a URL for a complete tarball, "sharing" the download location with
our other driver.
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/ibmehcad/ehea_EHEA_0002.tgz
We're waiting for a sourceforge project now since 9 days to put out a tgz,
and it looks
Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
Hello,
we tried two times to send a patch set. In both cases the second
(largest) patch
got lost. The first one was a bit above 100k, the second one we tried
was like 75K.
Any idea what might be the problem?
It might be size, or tripping a spam filter.
For a new d
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Thu, 8 Jun 2006 11:50:33 +0100), Gerrit
Renker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> + UDP-Lite introduces a new socket type, the SOCK_LDGRAM (note the L) for
> + lightweight, connection-less services. These are the socket options:
I disagree. It should be SOCK_DGRAM.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Thu, 8 Jun 2006 11:50:33 +0100), Gerrit
Renker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> Attached is an extension which adds RFC3828 - compliant UDP-Lite
> functionality
> to the IPv4 networking stack.
:
> net/core/sock.c |7
> net/ipv4/af_inet.c
Hello,
we tried two times to send a patch set. In both cases the second (largest) patch
got lost. The first one was a bit above 100k, the second one we tried was like
75K.
Any idea what might be the problem?
Thanks,
Jan-Bernd Themann
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Signed-off-by: Jan-Bernd Themann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
drivers/net/ehea/Kconfig |6 ++
drivers/net/ehea/Makefile |7 +++
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
--- linux-2.6.16-rc5-orig/drivers/net/ehea/Makefile 1969-12-31
16:00:00.0 -0800
+++ kernel/drivers/net/ehea/M
Signed-off-by: Jan-Bernd Themann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
drivers/net/ehea/ehea.h| 434 +
drivers/net/ehea/ehea_hw.h | 319 +
2 files changed, 753 insertions(+)
--- linux-2.6.16-rc5-orig/drivers/net/ehea/ehea.h
Signed-off-by: Jan-Bernd Themann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
drivers/net/ehea/ehea_qmr.c | 719
drivers/net/ehea/ehea_qmr.h | 390 +++
2 files changed, 1109 insertions(+)
--- linux-2.6.16-rc5-orig/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_qmr.c 1969-1
Hello,
thanks for your comments. It seems that yesterday's patch 1/4 has not been
delivered. We changed some things according to your comments.
Signed-off-by: Jan-Bernd Themann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changelog-by: Jan-Bernd Themann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Differences to patch set http://www.spinics.n
Signed-off-by: Jan-Bernd Themann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
drivers/net/ehea/ehea_phyp.c | 1023 +++
drivers/net/ehea/ehea_phyp.h | 625 ++
2 files changed, 1648 insertions(+)
--- linux-2.6.16-rc5-orig/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_phyp.c 19
On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 15:06:55 -0500
Steve Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +void c2_free(struct c2_alloc *alloc, u32 obj)
> +{
> + spin_lock(&alloc->lock);
> + clear_bit(obj, alloc->table);
> + spin_unlock(&alloc->lock);
> +}
The spinlock is unneeded here.
What does all the code
On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 15:06:05 -0500
Steve Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This patch provides the new files implementing the iWARP Connection
> Manager.
>
> Review Changes:
>
> - sizeof -> sizeof()
>
> - removed printks
>
> - removed TT debug code
>
> - cleaned up lock/unlock around switc
When ieee80211_wme_register fails in ieee80211_init, ieee80211 class was not
unregistered.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/d80211/ieee80211.c |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
3aed246a5117bd4d1a4f2d5f5074c583d9b4941e
diff --git a/net/d80211/ieee802
There is no necessity for passing ieee80211_local parameter to sta_info_put
and sta_info_free now.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/d80211/ieee80211.c | 18 +-
net/d80211/ieee80211_iface.c |4 ++--
net/d80211/ieee80211_ioctl.c | 20 ++---
Add /sys/class/ieee80211/phyX/sta/* attributes.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/d80211/Makefile |1
net/d80211/ieee80211.c |5 +
net/d80211/ieee80211_i.h | 14 ++
net/d80211/ieee80211_proc.c |3 -
net/d80211/ieee80211_sysfs
Remove procfs support.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/d80211/Makefile |1
net/d80211/ieee80211.c |7
net/d80211/ieee80211_iface.c |3
net/d80211/ieee80211_proc.c | 768 --
net/d80211/ieee80211_proc.h
sta_info structure has reference counting (will be converted to kobject in
next patch). Therefore, sta_info_release should be divided into two
functions - one for decrementing reference count and one for freeing the
structure when the count drops to zero. sta_info_release is the name
suitable for t
The following series of patches makes d80211 to use sysfs instead of procfs.
This means that custom reference counting in most structures is replaced by
kobjects and nearly all informations from procfs files are converted to
sysfs attributes.
The only information missing in sysfs (compared to proc
Add /sys/class/net/X/* attributes for 802.11 interfaces.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/d80211/ieee80211_i.h |3
net/d80211/ieee80211_iface.c |1
net/d80211/ieee80211_sysfs.c | 299 ++
3 files changed, 301 insertions(+
Add /sys/class/ieee80211/phyX/* attributes.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/d80211/ieee80211_proc.c |4 -
net/d80211/ieee80211_proc.h |3
net/d80211/ieee80211_sysfs.c | 304 +-
3 files changed, 302 insertions(+), 9 deletio
Lately, delayed sysfs registration of net_device (in netdev_run_todo) was
removed. This allows us to remove hack that used class interface for sysfs
registration.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/d80211/ieee80211.c | 18 +++--
net/d80211/ieee80211_i.h
When add_iface or remove_iface sysfs attribute is opened just before device
is unregistered and some data is written there afterwards, their handlers
try to access master net_device which is released at that point.
A similar problem can happen when ioctl is invoked during unregistering - it
is pos
Add support for sysfs attributes for rate_control modules.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/d80211/ieee80211.c| 13 -
net/d80211/rate_control.c | 42 ++
net/d80211/rate_control.h | 36 +
Add /sys/class/ieee80211/phyX/sta/*/key/* and /sys/class/net/X/keys/[0-3]/*
attributes.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/d80211/ieee80211.c | 33 ++
net/d80211/ieee80211_i.h | 11 ++
net/d80211/ieee80211_ioctl.c | 101 ---
net/d
ieee80211_local has a separate class_device. That means it has reference
counting independent of master net_device and can be freed at a different
time, therefore these two structures cannot be allocated together.
Solve this by adding ieee80211_ptr pointer to net_device structure (similar
to other
Hi!
> > >Well, I'll try _enable() alone, but it seems to me that _enable()
> > >command is needed to initialize radio properly. I do not think we can
> > >get much further without firmware sources...
> >
> > If you can formulate a proper and technical description of the issue
> > (and exactly wh
Hi!
> >Well, I'll try _enable() alone, but it seems to me that _enable()
> >command is needed to initialize radio properly. I do not think we can
> >get much further without firmware sources...
>
> If you can formulate a proper and technical description of the issue
> (and exactly what is needed
101 - 127 of 127 matches
Mail list logo