Re: [1/4] kevent: core files.

2006-06-24 Thread Robert Iakobashvili
Hi, According to numbers: kevent compared to epoll resulted in the folllowing numbers: kevent: more than 2600 requests per second (trivial web server) epoll: about 1600-1800 requests. Number of errors for 3k bursts of connections with 30K connections total in 10seconds: kevent: about 2k errors.

Re: [PATCH 3/3] bcm43xx-d80211: use host_gen_beacon_template

2006-06-24 Thread Jiri Benc
Fri, 23 Jun 2006 23:12:15 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > John, please apply. Please do not apply the whole series yet, it is experimental and not well tested (I wrote it in the introduction e-mail but will ensure I put it also in subjects next time). For example, I just realized that the first pa

[PATCH 1/3] d80211: experimental: do not receive through master interface when not scanning

2006-06-24 Thread Jiri Benc
This is a corrected version of the patch. I also updated the 'devel' branch of my tree. --- Arrived packets should not go into master interface except when scanning - it leads to duplicate packets reception. This also fixes a race when scanning is finished during invoking of rx handlers. Signed-

Re: [NET]: Prevent multiple qdisc runs

2006-06-24 Thread Jamal Hadi Salim
On Fri, 2006-23-06 at 13:35 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 08:52:17PM -0400, jamal wrote: > > > > It does feel like the qdisc_is_running though is now a replacement > > for the need for dev->txlock which existed to protect multi-cpus from > > entering the device transmit path.

RE: [PATCH 0/2] NET: Accurate packet scheduling for ATM/ADSL

2006-06-24 Thread jamal
On Fri, 2006-23-06 at 22:37 +1000, Russell Stuart wrote: > Sorry for the digest like reply :( ;-> I know this discussion has gone in a few directions already and i am sure as you kept responding to the emails it became obvious. Let me just jump to one point so we dont repeat a lot of the same th

Re: [PATCH 0/2][RFC] Network Event Notifier Mechanism

2006-06-24 Thread jamal
On Fri, 2006-23-06 at 08:24 -0500, Steve Wise wrote: > > > PS:- I do think what they need is to hear route cache generation > > as opposed to ARP+FIB updates; but lets wait and see how clever > > the patches would look. > > > Can you expand on your statement above? If hooking route cache > ge

Re: [PATCH 0/2] NET: Accurate packet scheduling for ATM/ADSL

2006-06-24 Thread jamal
On Fri, 2006-23-06 at 16:32 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: > jamal wrote: > > If you do it in user space you will need a daemon of some form; this is > > my preference but it seems a lot of people hate daemons - the standard > > claim is it is counter-usability. Such people are forgiving if you bui

Re: 2.6.17-mm2

2006-06-24 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 21:41:41 +0200 Dominik Karall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday, 24. June 2006 15:19, Andrew Morton wrote: > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.1 > >7/2.6.17-mm2/ > > hi! > > I get this warning on make modules_install: > > WARNING: /li