On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 04:09:43PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> The following race is possible when one cpu unregisters the handler
> while other one is trying to receive a message and call this one:
Good catch! But I think we need a bit more to close this fully.
Dumps can resume asynchronousl
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 09:33:23AM +, Florian Zumbiehl wrote:
>
> I am not absolutely sure whether this actually is a bug (as in: I've got
> no clue what the standards say or what other implementations do), but at
> least I was pretty surprised when I noticed that a recv() on a
> non-blocking
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 10:56:48AM +, Gerrit Renker wrote:
>
> | - InDatagrams: Total number of received datagrams.
> | + InDatagrams: The total number of UDP datagrams delivered to UDP
> users.
> You are in the UDP-Lite documentation -- it should read "UDP-Lite", not UDP.
We coul
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 04:02:19PM +0900, Joonwoo Park wrote:
>
> [NET]: Fix TX bug VLAN in VLAN
> Fix misbehavior of vlan_dev_hard_start_xmit() for recursive encapsulations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joonwoo Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Applied to net-2.6. Thanks!
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswa
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 07:54:59PM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:
>
> I've fixed up those errors.
OK, patch applied to net-2.6.25. Thanks everyone!
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbe
Thank you for doing this work, there is a small comment below.
| --- linux-2.6.24.rc3.org/Documentation/networking/udplite.txt 2007-11-19
12:37:40.0 +0800
| +++ linux-2.6.24.rc3/Documentation/networking/udplite.txt 2007-11-28
18:35:29.0 +0800
| @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@
|
|Th
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 09:02:08PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> sungem's gem_reset_task() will unconditionally try to disable NAPI even
> when it's called while the interface is not operating and hence the NAPI
> struct isn't enabled. Make napi_disable() depend on gp->running.
>
> Also removes a
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:29:40 +1100), Herbert Xu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 05:16:16PM +, Templin, Fred L wrote:
> > From: Fred L. Templin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > This patch includes support for the Intra-Site Automatic Tunnel
> > A
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 06:33:01PM +0800, Wang Chen wrote:
>
> I cooked the patch based on Andi's and left the new counter.
> Frankly, I don't like the EarlyDatagrams too.
> So, I will remove it and resubmit.
Sounds good. Thanks for all your efforts on this problem!
--
Visit Openswan at http://w
Herbert Xu said the following on 2007-11-29 18:21:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 06:08:30PM +0800, Wang Chen wrote:
>> Add a new UdpInEarlyDatagrams counter to count datagrams received early,
>> but which might be dropped later.
>
> Could you please split this into two patches? Have one do the
> UdpIn
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 07:55:12PM +, Paul Moore wrote:
> Currently the netmask/prefix-length of an IPsec SPD entry is not included in
> any of the SPD related audit messages. This can cause a problem when the
> audit log is examined as the netmask/prefix-length is vital in determining
> what
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 05:16:16PM +, Templin, Fred L wrote:
> From: Fred L. Templin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This patch includes support for the Intra-Site Automatic Tunnel
> Addressing Protocol (ISATAP) per RFC4214. It uses the SIT
> module, and is configured using extensions to the "iproute2
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 08:17:27PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> The 3rd argument is always zero (according to grep :) Eliminate
> it and merge the function with sk_stream_alloc_skb.
>
> This saves 44 more bytes, and together with the previous patch
> we have:
>
> add/remove: 1/0 grow/shrink: 0
On Thursday 29 November 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > I think it would be good if you could specify a default namespace
> > per module, that could reduce the amount of necessary changes significantly.
>
> But also give less documentation. It's also not that difficult to mark
> the exports once. I've
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 06:08:30PM +0800, Wang Chen wrote:
>
> Add a new UdpInEarlyDatagrams counter to count datagrams received early,
> but which might be dropped later.
Could you please split this into two patches? Have one do the
UdpInDatagrams change and the other to introduce the EarlyDatag
Herbert Xu said the following on 2007-11-29 17:21:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 03:55:38PM +0800, Wang Chen wrote:
>
> Excellent. They now do a recvmsg first with no buffer to get
> meta-information, which just happens to increment the counters.
>
> Could you please resubmit the patch then?
>
[SN
> I think it would be good if you could specify a default namespace
> per module, that could reduce the amount of necessary changes significantly.
But also give less documentation. It's also not that difficult to mark
the exports once. I've forward ported such patches over a few kernels
and didn'
[NET]: Move netfilter checksum helpers to net/core/utils.c
This allows to get rid of the CONFIG_NETFILTER dependency of NET_ACT_NAT.
This patch redefines the old names to keep the noise low, the next patch
converts all users.
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
commit 01879e49
[NETFILTER]: Convert old checksum helper names
Kill the defines again, convert to the new checksum helper names and
remove the dependency of NET_ACT_NAT on NETFILTER.
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
commit da8ffc485b6e8e429c51f7f1c03a0ae824eca848
tree 2198c531b224c82e74b66
These patches remove the dependency of NET_ACT_NAT on NETFILTER
by moving the netfilter checksum helpers to include/net/checksum
and net/core/utils.c. I didn't find more appropriate locations,
but I'd happily change it if someone suggests something better.
include/linux/netfilter.h
On Thursday 22 November 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:
> #define EXPORT_SYMBOL(sym) \
> - __EXPORT_SYMBOL(sym, "")
> + __EXPORT_SYMBOL(sym, "",,, NULL)
>
> #define EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sym) \
> - __EXPORT_SYMBOL(sym, "_
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 03:55:38PM +0800, Wang Chen wrote:
>
> I tested nfsv3 & nfsv4. It seems that nfs calls recvmsg() like
> following:nfsd()->svc_recv()->svc_udp_recvfrom()->udp_recvmsg().
> So, I think putting the udpInDatagrams increment in udp_recvmsg()
> is enough.
>
> FYI:
> http://www.m
101 - 122 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
