[PATCH net-next v2] sxgbe: remove unused code

2016-02-09 Thread Jεan Sacren
From: Jean Sacren Remove the unused code of sxgbe_xpcs. Reported-by: Julia Lawall Suggested-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Jean Sacren Cc: Byungho An Cc: Girish K S Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.10.1601191918470.2531@hadrien --- v2: Rewrite the changelog per request by Shu

[PATCH net-next] sxgbe: remove unused code

2016-02-03 Thread Jεan Sacren
From: Jean Sacren With the introduction of this commit 1edb9ca69e8a ("net: sxgbe: add basic framework for Samsung 10Gb ethernet driver"), the following interface was added: int sxgbe_xpcs_init(struct net_device *ndev); int sxgbe_xpcs_init_1G(struct net_device *ndev); But those t

Re: question about samsung/sxgbe/sxgbe_xpcs.c

2016-01-21 Thread Jεan Sacren
From: David Miller Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 10:45:20 -0800 > > Yes, you will submit to me a patch to remove the unused code. I should have paraphrased it better: "I have the patch ready and will submit it when net-next opens again."

Re: question about samsung/sxgbe/sxgbe_xpcs.c

2016-01-20 Thread Jεan Sacren
From: David Miller Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 14:36:28 -0500 > > From: Julia Lawall > Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 19:54:20 +0100 (CET) [...] > > I just wondered. I was looking at dependencies between networking files. > > This one stands out because nothing is dependenton it, even the files it > > is c

[PATCH net-next] sock: fix kernel doc error

2015-08-27 Thread Jεan Sacren
From: Jean Sacren The symbol '__sk_reclaim' is not present in the current tree. Apparently '__sk_reclaim' was meant to be '__sk_mem_reclaim', so fix it with the right symbol name for the kernel doc. Signed-off-by: Jean Sacren Cc: Hideo Aoki --- net/core/sock.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insert