John Heffner wrote:
> Jeroen Massar wrote:
>> John Heffner wrote:
>>
>>> Jeroen Massar wrote:
>>>
>>>> I wonder how many RFC's it violates. An interface must only answer
>>>> ARP's
>>>> on the interface that it is c
John Heffner wrote:
> Jeroen Massar wrote:
>> I wonder how many RFC's it violates. An interface must only answer ARP's
>> on the interface that it is configured on, not anything else.
>
> Not true. See RFC 1122, section 3.3.4. The standard leaves this
> deci
Marc Singer wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 09:01:00AM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 10:33:32AM -0800, Ben Greear wrote:
>> The association between IP addresses and links is already a bit murky.
>> Reference the arp_announce sysctl for what I mean. I recall Dave M.
>>
John W. Linville wrote:
> Of course, patches would be helpful...
/sbin/ipadd
#!/bin/sh
ip addr add $1 dev lo
/sbin/ipdel
#!/bin/sh
ip addr del $1 dev lo
/sbin/ipactivate
#!/bin/sh
ip addr add $1 dev $2
/sbin/ipdeactivate
#!/bin/sh
ip addr del $1 dev $2
There are your 'patches'. Add -6'
