On 7/28/20 4:41 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 7/28/2020 4:11 AM, John Johansen wrote:
>> On 7/24/20 1:32 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>>> Change security_secctx_to_secid() to fill in a lsmblob instead
>>> of a u32 secid. Multiple LSMs may be able to interpret the
>
On 7/24/20 1:32 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> Replace the (secctx,seclen) pointer pair with a single
> lsmcontext pointer to allow return of the LSM identifier
> along with the context and context length. This allows
> security_release_secctx() to know how to release the
> context. Callers have been
t() to use a
> lsmblob instead of a u32 secid. In some other cases there is
> scaffolding where interfaces have yet to be converted.
>
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook
> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
one comment below, but its a nice to have so
Reviewed-by: Joh
On 7/9/20 9:11 AM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 8:23 PM Casey Schaufler wrote:
>>
>> Change the data used in UDS SO_PEERSEC processing from a
>> secid to a more general struct lsmblob. Update the
>> security_socket_getpeersec_dgram() interface to use the
>> lsmblob. There is a s
On 09/26/2018 02:22 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 09/26/2018 11:09 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>> Hello, Alexei and Daniel.
>>
>> Can you show us how to run testcases you are testing?
>
> Sorry for the delay; currently quite backlogged but will definitely take a
> look
> at these reports. Regarding
have no objections to it being merged for 4.12.
If it isn't this change is already queued up for the apparmor 4.13
merge
Acked-by: John Johansen
> ---
> security/apparmor/apparmorfs.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/apparmor
