Re: neigh: timer & !nud_in_timer

2008-01-03 Thread John Sigler
John Sigler wrote: I noticed the following message in my kernel log. kernel: neigh: timer & !nud_in_timer (Might be due to a race condition.) I'm running a UP Linux version 2.6.22.1-rt9 ( http://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php ) The following /proc entries might be relevant. /proc/sys

neigh: timer & !nud_in_timer

2007-12-20 Thread John Sigler
Hello, I noticed the following message in my kernel log. kernel: neigh: timer & !nud_in_timer (Might be due to a race condition.) I'm running a UP Linux version 2.6.22.1-rt9 ( http://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php ) The following /proc entries might be relevant. /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/arp_a

Re: 82557/8/9 Ethernet Pro 100 interrupt mitigation support

2007-09-04 Thread John Sigler
Jesse Brandeburg wrote: Auke Kok wrote: Marc Sigler wrote: I have several systems with three integrated Intel 82559 (I *think*). Does someone know if these boards support hardware interrupt mitigation? I.e. is it possible to configure them to raise an IRQ only if their hardware buffer is fu

Re: 82557/8/9 Ethernet Pro 100 interrupt mitigation support

2007-09-03 Thread John Sigler
John Sigler wrote: I have several systems with three integrated Intel 82559 (I *think*). Does someone know if these boards support hardware interrupt mitigation? I.e. is it possible to configure them to raise an IRQ only if their hardware buffer is full OR if some given time (say 1 ms) has

82557/8/9 Ethernet Pro 100 interrupt mitigation support

2007-09-03 Thread John Sigler
(Please ignore previous message, it was sent from the wrong account.) Hello everyone, I have several systems with three integrated Intel 82559 (I *think*). Does someone know if these boards support hardware interrupt mitigation? I.e. is it possible to configure them to raise an IRQ only if thei