On 12/01/2017 09:47 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 05:10:35AM -0500, w...@redhat.com wrote:
>> From: Wei Xu
>>
>> Matthew found a roughly 40% tcp throughput regression with commit
>> c67df11f(vhost_net: try batch dequing from skb array) as discussed
>> in the following thr
On 11/27/2017 08:36 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2017年11月28日 00:21, Wei Xu wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 02:25:17PM -0500, Matthew Rosato wrote:
>>> On 11/14/2017 03:11 PM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
>>>> On 11/12/2017 01:34 PM, Wei Xu wrote:
>>&g
On 11/14/2017 03:11 PM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> On 11/12/2017 01:34 PM, Wei Xu wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 03:59:54PM -0500, Matthew Rosato wrote:
>>>>> This case should be quite similar with pkgten, if you got improvement with
>>>>> pktgen, usually
On 11/12/2017 01:34 PM, Wei Xu wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 03:59:54PM -0500, Matthew Rosato wrote:
>>>> This case should be quite similar with pkgten, if you got improvement with
>>>> pktgen, usually it was also the same for UDP, could you please try to
>>&
>> This case should be quite similar with pkgten, if you got improvement with
>> pktgen, usually it was also the same for UDP, could you please try to disable
>> tso, gso, gro, ufo on all host tap devices and guest virtio-net devices?
>> Currently
>> the most significant tests would be like this A
On 11/04/2017 07:35 PM, Wei Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 12:30:12AM -0400, Matthew Rosato wrote:
>> On 10/31/2017 03:07 AM, Wei Xu wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 01:53:12PM -0400, Matthew Rosato wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you
On 10/31/2017 03:07 AM, Wei Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 01:53:12PM -0400, Matthew Rosato wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Are you using the same binding as mentioned in previous mail sent by you? it
>>> might be caused by cpu convention between pktgen and vhost, co
>
> Are you using the same binding as mentioned in previous mail sent by you? it
> might be caused by cpu convention between pktgen and vhost, could you please
> try to run pktgen from another idle cpu by adjusting the binding?
I don't think that's the case -- I can cause pktgen to hang in the
On 10/23/2017 09:57 AM, Wei Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 04:17:51PM -0400, Matthew Rosato wrote:
>> On 10/12/2017 02:31 PM, Wei Xu wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 04:07:45PM -0400, Matthew Rosato wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Ping... Jason, any othe
On 10/22/2017 10:06 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2017年10月19日 04:17, Matthew Rosato wrote:
>>> 2. It might be useful to short the traffic path as a reference, What
>>> I am running
>>> is briefly like:
>>> pktgen(host kernel) -> tap(x)
On 10/12/2017 02:31 PM, Wei Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 04:07:45PM -0400, Matthew Rosato wrote:
>>
>> Ping... Jason, any other ideas or suggestions?
>
> Hi Matthew,
> Recently I am doing similar test on x86 for this patch, here are some,
> differences between
On 09/25/2017 04:18 PM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> On 09/22/2017 12:03 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2017年09月21日 03:38, Matthew Rosato wrote:
>>>> Seems to make some progress on wakeup mitigation. Previous patch tries
>>>> to reduce the unnecessa
On 09/22/2017 12:03 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2017年09月21日 03:38, Matthew Rosato wrote:
>>> Seems to make some progress on wakeup mitigation. Previous patch tries
>>> to reduce the unnecessary traversal of waitqueue during rx. Attached
>>> patch goes ev
> Seems to make some progress on wakeup mitigation. Previous patch tries
> to reduce the unnecessary traversal of waitqueue during rx. Attached
> patch goes even further which disables rx polling during processing tx.
> Please try it to see if it has any difference.
Unfortunately, this patch does
On 09/18/2017 03:36 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2017年09月18日 11:13, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2017年09月16日 03:19, Matthew Rosato wrote:
>>>> It looks like vhost is slowed down for some reason which leads to more
>>>> idle time on 4.13+V
> It looks like vhost is slowed down for some reason which leads to more
> idle time on 4.13+VHOST_RX_BATCH=1. Appreciated if you can collect the
> perf.diff on host, one for rx and one for tx.
>
perf data below for the associated vhost threads, baseline=4.12,
delta1=4.13, delta2=4.13+VHOST_RX_BA
> Is the issue gone if you reduce VHOST_RX_BATCH to 1? And it would be
> also helpful to collect perf diff to see if anything interesting.
> (Consider 4.4 shows more obvious regression, please use 4.4).
>
Issue still exists when I force VHOST_RX_BATCH = 1
Collected perf data, with 4.12 as the b
On 09/13/2017 04:13 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2017年09月13日 09:16, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2017年09月13日 01:56, Matthew Rosato wrote:
>>> We are seeing a regression for a subset of workloads across KVM guests
>>> over a virtual bridge
We are seeing a regression for a subset of workloads across KVM guests
over a virtual bridge between host kernel 4.12 and 4.13. Bisecting
points to c67df11f "vhost_net: try batch dequing from skb array"
In the regressed environment, we are running 4 kvm guests, 2 running as
uperf servers and 2 ru
19 matches
Mail list logo
